UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted byRule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ | Soliciting Material |
Ivy Funds
Ivy NextShares
InvestEd Portfolios
Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios
(NamesName of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||||||
☒ | No fee required. | |||||||
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange ActRules 14a-6(i)(1) and0-11. | |||||||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |||||||
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |||||||
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange ActRule 0-11 (set | |||||||
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |||||||
(5) |
Total fee paid: | |||||||
| ||||||||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||||||
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange ActRule 0-11(a)(2) and | |||||||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | |||||||
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||||||
(3) |
Filing Party: | |||||||
(4) |
Date Filed: | |||||||
|
IVY FUNDS
IVY NEXTSHARES
INVESTED PORTFOLIOS
IVY VARIABLE INSURANCE PORTFOLIOS
Ivy VIP Growth
6300 Lamar Avenue
Overland Park, Kansas 66202
February 12, 2019July 22, 2020
Dear Shareholder:
A joint special meeting (the “Meeting”) of the shareholders of the Ivy Funds, Ivy NextShares, InvestEd Portfolios andVIP Growth (the “Fund”), a series of Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios (collectively, the “Trusts” and each individually, a “Trust,” with each series of a Trust referred to as a “Fund,” and collectively as the “Funds”(the “Trust”), will be held via audio teleconference on April 26, 2019August 21, 2020, at 2:10:00 p.m.a.m., Central Time, at the offices of the Trusts, 6300 Lamar Avenue, Overland Park, Kansas 66202 (the “Meeting”).
Time. You are receivinghave received this letter because you were a shareholder of record of at least onethe Fund as of January 30, 2019 (the “Record Date”).on July 17, 2020. I am writing to ask for your vote at the Meeting onregarding the following proposalsproposal affecting the Funds,Fund, as well as to transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournments thereof:
To change the classification of |
|
|
With respect to Ivy Natural Resources Fund, a series of Ivy Funds, to approve changing the Fund’s fundamental policy on concentration to state that the Fund will concentrate its investments in securities of issuers that produce, refine, develop, store, transport or supply energy or industrial products (i.e., building materials, packaging, chemicals, base metals, forest and agricultural products or provide basic servicesfrom a “diversified” fund to the natural resources industry).
With respect to Ivy VIP Natural Resources, a series of Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios, to approve changing the Fund’s fundamental policy on concentration to state that the Fund will“non-diversified” fund.
concentrate its investments in securities of issuers that produce, refine, develop, store, transport or supply energy or industrial products (i.e., building materials, packaging, chemicals, base metals, forest and agricultural products or provide basic services to the natural resources industry).
The Board of Trustees of eachthe Trust has approved, and unanimously recommends that you vote FOR, all trustee nominees in proposal 1 and FOR proposals 2 and 3.the proposal.
Detailed information about the proposalsproposal is contained in the enclosed materials. Please review and consider the enclosed materials carefully, and then please take a moment to vote.
Attendance atDue to the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) and to support the health and well-being of our shareholders, employees, and community, the Meeting will be limitedconducted exclusively via audio teleconference. Shareholders may attend the Meeting telephonically. Any shareholder wishing to each Trust’s shareholdersparticipate in the Meeting telephonically can do so. If you were a record holder of the Fund shares as of July 17, 2020, please email our proxy solicitor, Di Costa Partners (“DCP”), at meetinginfo@dicostapartners.com no later than 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 20, 2020 to register. Please include the Record Date. Photographic identificationFund’s name in the subject line and provide your name and address in the body of the e-mail. DCP will then e-mail you the conference call dial-in information and instructions for voting during the Meeting. If you held Fund shares through an intermediary, such as a broker-dealer, as of July 17, 2020, and you want to participate in the Meeting, please e-mail DCP at meetinginfo@dicostapartners.com no later than 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 20, 2020 to register. Please include the Fund’s name in the subject line and provide your name, address and proof of ownership as of July 17, 2020 from your intermediary. Please be requiredaware that if you wish to vote at the Meeting you must first obtain a legal
proxy from your intermediary reflecting the Fund’s name, the number of Fund shares you held and your name and e-mail address. You may forward an e-mail from your intermediary containing the legal proxy or e-mail an image of the legal proxy to DCP at meetinginfo@dicostapartners.com and put “Legal Proxy” in the subject line. DCP will then e-mail you the conference call dial-in information and instructions for admissionvoting during the Meeting.
The conference call dial-in number will only be active for the date and time of the meeting. If you have any questions prior to the Meeting. meeting, please call DCP at the phone number provided below.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Meeting in person,via teleconference, your vote is needed.
Attendance at the Meeting will be limited to shareholders of the Fund as of the close of business on July 17, 2020. You are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting and any adjournment of the Meeting, even if you no longer hold shares of athe Fund. Your vote is important no matter how many shares you own. It is important that your vote be received no later than the time of the Meeting.
Voting is quick and easy. Everything you need is enclosed.You may vote by completing and returning your proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid return envelope, by calling the toll-free telephone number listed on the enclosed proxy card, or by visiting the Internet website listed on the enclosed proxy card. You may receive more than one set of proxy materials if you hold shares in more than one account. Please be sure to vote each proxy card you receive. If we do not hear from you, our proxy solicitor, Mediant Communications,DCP may contact you. This will ensure that your vote is counted even if you cannot or do not wish to attendparticipate in the Meeting in person.Meeting. If you have any questions about the ProposalsProposal or the voting instructions, you may call Mediant Communications DCP at1-844-288-1895 (833) 892-6622 and a representative will assist you.
Your vote is important to us. Thank you for your response and for your investment.
Sincerely,
Philip J. SandersJennifer K. Dulski
PresidentSecretary of the TrustsTrust
IVY FUNDS
IVY NEXTSHARES
INVESTED PORTFOLIOS
IVY VARIABLEVARIALBE INSURANCE PORTFOLIOS
6300 Lamar Avenue
Overland Park, Kansas 66202Ivy VIP Growth
NOTICE OF JOINT SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 21, 2020
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a joint special meeting of the shareholders of the Ivy Funds, Ivy NextShares, InvestEd Portfolios andVIP Growth (the “Fund”), a series of Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios (collectively, the “Trusts” and each individually, a “Trust,” with each series of a Trust referred to as a “Fund,” and collectively as the “Funds”(the “Trust”), will be held via audio teleconference on April 26, 2019,August 21, 2020, at 2:10:00 p.m.a.m., Central Time at the offices of the Trusts, 6300 Lamar Avenue, Overland Park, Kansas 66202 (the “Meeting”). At the Meeting, shareholders will be asked to consider and vote upon the following proposals (collectively, the “Proposals,” with each being aproposal (the “Proposal”) and to act upon anytransact such other business whichas may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournmentadjournments, postponements or postponementdelays thereof:
Proposal | Shareholders Entitled to Vote | |||
| To | All shareholders of | ||
| ||||
|
The Board of Trustees of eachthe Trust (collectively, the(the “Board”) has approved and unanimouslythe Proposal. The Board also recommends that you vote “FOR” all nomineesFOR the Proposal, which you can do by filling out and signing the enclosed proxy card and returning it to us in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposal 2 and “FOR” Proposal 3.the enclosed postage-paid envelope so that we know how you would like to vote.
The Proposals areProposal is discussed in greater detail in the enclosedaccompanying proxy statement. Please read the proxy statement carefully for information concerning the Proposals.
Proposal. The person(s) namedenclosed materials contain the Notice of Meeting of Shareholders, proxy statement and proxy card(s). A proxy card is, in essence, a ballot. When you vote your proxy, it tells us how you wish to vote on important issues relating to the Fund. If you complete, sign and return the proxy card, we will vote it as you indicated. If you simply sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card, but do not specify a vote, your proxy will vote in his or her discretion on any other business that may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. In the event that the necessary quorum to transact business or the vote required to approve each Proposal is not obtained at the Meeting, the person named as proxy may propose one or more adjournments of the Meeting, in accordance with applicable law, to permit further solicitation of proxies. Any such adjournment will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of beneficial interest of a Trust for a vote pursuant to Proposal 1, or a Fund for a vote pursuant to Proposals 2 or 3, present in person or by proxy at the Meeting or an adjournment thereof. The person(s) named as proxy will vote “FOR” any such adjournment those proxies which he or she is entitled to vote in favor of the Proposal and will vote “AGAINST” any such adjournment those proxies to be voted againstFOR the Proposals.Proposal.
Shareholders of record of anythe Fund at the close of business on January 30, 2019 (the “Record Date”)July 17, 2020 are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting and any adjournments, postponements or delays thereof. Each shareholderIt is invited to attend the Meeting in person. However, if you cannotimportant that your shares be presentvoted at the Meeting, we urge you to complete, sign and dateMeeting. You may vote by telephone, Internet or by completing the enclosed proxy card,card(s) and returnreturning it in the accompanying postage-paid envelope as promptly as possible, or take advantage ofpossible. You may also vote by attending the telephonic or electronic voting procedures described on the proxy card.Meeting via audio teleconference.
Please contact our proxy solicitor, Mediant Communications, ifREGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU PLAN TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING VIA TELECONFERENCE, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ACCOMPANYING POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE OR VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR THROUGH THE INTERNET PURSUANT TO THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.
If you plan to attend the Meeting by calling 1-844-288-1895. You may also speakvia teleconference and wish to a representative, who can assistvote at that time, you with any questions, by calling1-844-288-1895. Shareholders who intendwill be able to attenddo so and your vote at the Meeting will revoke any proxy you may have submitted. Merely attending the Meeting via teleconference, however, will not revoke a previously given proxy.
Due to the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) and to support the health and well-being of our shareholders, employees, and community, the Meeting will be conducted exclusively via audio teleconference. Any shareholder wishing to participate in personthe Meeting telephonically can do so. If you were a record holder of the Fund shares as of July 17, 2020, please send an e-mail to the Fund’s proxy solicitor, Di Costa Partners (“DCP”), at meetinginfo@dicostapartners.com no later than 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 20, 2020 to register. Please include the Fund’s name in the subject line and provide your name and address in the body of the e-mail. DCP will need to bring proof of share ownership,then e-mail you the conference call dial-in information and instructions for voting during the Meeting. If you held Fund shares through an intermediary, such as a shareholder statement or letter from a custodian or broker-dealer, confirmingas of July 17, 2020, and you want to participate in the Meeting, please e-mail DCP at meetinginfo@dicostapartners.com no later than 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 20, 2020 to register. Please include the Fund’s name in the subject line and provide your name, address and proof of ownership as of July 17, 2020 from your intermediary. Please be aware that if you wish to vote at the Record Date, and a valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, for admission to the Meeting. Shareholders whose shares are held in “street name” through their broker will need toMeeting you must first obtain a legal proxy from their brokeryour intermediary reflecting the Fund’s name(s), the number of Fund shares you held and present it at the Meeting in order to vote in person.your name and e-mail address. You may revokeforward an e-mail from your intermediary containing the legal proxy or e-mail an image of the legal proxy to DCP at any time before or at the Meeting,meetinginfo@dicostapartners.com and you may attend the Meeting to vote in person even though a proxy card already may have been returned. However, whether or not you expect to attend the Meeting in person, we urge you to complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy cardput “Legal Proxy” in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or vote by telephone or throughsubject line. DCP will then e-mail you the Internet.conference call dial-in information and instructions for voting during the Meeting.
Your vote is importantThe conference call dial-in number will only be active for the date and time of the meeting. If you have any questions prior to us. Thank you for taking the time to consider the Proposals you are entitled to vote.meeting, please call DCP at (833) 892-6622.
YOUR VOTE IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. NO MATTER HOW MANY SHARES YOU OWN, PLEASE SEND IN THE PROXY CARD, OR VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET TODAY.
By Order of the Board of Trustees, of
Ivy Funds
Ivy NextShares
InvestEd Portfolios and
Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios
Philip J. SandersJennifer K. Dulski
President of the TrustsSecretary
February 12, 2019July 22, 2020
PROXY STATEMENT
ForOF
IVY FUNDS,VIP GROWTH
IVY NEXTSHARES,a series of Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios
INVESTED PORTFOLIOS,DATED JULY 22, 2020
andfor
IVY VARIABLE INSURANCE PORTFOLIOS
6300 Lamar Avenue
Overland Park, Kansas 66202
Dated February 12, 2019
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE JOINT SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON APRIL 26, 2019AUGUST 21, 2020
This joint proxy statement (“Joint Proxy Statement”) is being furnished to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the BoardsBoard of Trustees (each a “Board,” and collectively, the(the “Board”) of the Ivy Funds, Ivy NextShares, InvestEd Portfolios and Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios (collectively,(the “Trust”) on behalf of one of its series, the “Trusts” and each individually, a “Trust,” with each series of a Trust referred to as a “Fund,” and collectively as the “Funds”Ivy VIP Growth (the “Fund”), to be voted at a jointthe special meeting of shareholders of the TrustsFund on April 26, 2019 at 2:00 p.m., Central Time, at the offices of the Trusts, 6300 Lamar Avenue, Overland Park, Kansas 66202,August 21, 2020, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Meeting”). The Meeting will be held via audio teleconference at 10:00 a.m., Central Time.
The Joint Proxy Statement provides you with information you should review before voting on the matters listed in the accompanying Notice of Special Meeting of Shareholders.Shareholders (“Notice of Meeting”). Much of the information in this Joint Proxy Statement is required under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).Commission. If there is anything you do not understand, please contact usour proxy solicitor, Di Costa Partners (“DCP”), at our toll-free number800-777-6472. This Joint(833) 892-6622.
The Notice of Meeting, the enclosed proxy card and this Proxy Statement (collectively, the Notice of the Joint Special Meeting of Shareholders and related proxy card(s) will be“Proxy Materials”) are first being mailed to shareholders of the Funds beginningFund’s shareholders on or about February 15, 2019.
1
Proposals/Proposal/Shareholders Entitled to Vote
The Meeting is being called to ask shareholders of the Fund to consider and vote on the following proposals (collectively, the “Proposals,” with each referred to as aproposal (the “Proposal”), which areis described more fully below:
Proposal | Shareholders Entitled to Vote | |||
To | All | |||
|
| |||
|
|
The Board has unanimously approved, and recommends that you vote “FOR” all nominees in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposal 2 and “FOR” Proposal 3.FOR, the Proposal.
1
Shareholders of record of the FundsFund as of the close of business on January 30, 2019July 17, 2020 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to attend and to vote at the Meeting. As of the Record Date, the number of shares of eachthe Fund and class thereof, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Meeting are setis forth in Appendix A.herein.
TheDue to the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) and to support the health and well-being of our shareholders, employees, and community, the Meeting will be held atconducted exclusively via audio teleconference. Any shareholder wishing to participate in the officesMeeting telephonically can do so. If you were a record holder of the Trusts, 6300 Lamar Avenue, Overland Park, Kansas 66202. Shareholders who are eligibleFund shares as of the Record Date, please email DCP at meetinginfo@dicostapartners.com no later than 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 20, 2020 to voteregister. Please include the Fund’s name in the subject line and who intend to attendprovide your name and address in the Meeting in personbody of the e-mail. DCP will need to bring proof of share ownership,then e-mail you the conference call dial-in information and instructions for voting during the Meeting. If you held Fund shares through an intermediary, such as a shareholder statement or letter from a custodian or broker-dealer, confirmingas of the Record Date, and you want to participate in the Meeting, please e-mail DCP at meetinginfo@dicostapartners.com no later than 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 20, 2020 to register. Please include the Fund’s name in the subject line and provide your name, address and proof of ownership as of the Record Date from your intermediary. Please be aware that if you wish to vote at the Meeting you must first obtain a legal proxy from your intermediary reflecting the Fund’s name(s), the number of Fund shares you held and a valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license your name and e-mail address. You may forward an e-mail from your intermediary containing the legal proxy or passport,e-mail an image of the legal proxy to DCP at meetinginfo@dicostapartners.com and put “Legal Proxy” in the subject line. DCP will then e-mail you the conference call dial-in information and instructions for admissionvoting during the Meeting.
The conference call dial-in number will only be active for the date and time of the meeting. If you have any questions prior to the Meeting.meeting, please call DCP at the phone number provided above.
If you do not expect to be present at the Meeting via teleconference and wish to vote your shares, please vote your proxy in accordance with the instructions included on the enclosed proxy card(s). If your proxy is properly returned, shares represented by it will be voted at the Meeting in
2
accordance with your instructions for the Proposals you are entitled to vote.Proposal. If your proxy is properly executed and returned and no choice is specified on the proxy card(s) with respect to the Proposals you are entitled to vote,Proposal, the proxy will be voted FOR the approval of eachthe Proposal you are entitled to vote and in accordance with the judgment of the person appointed as proxy upon any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting. Shareholders who execute proxies may revoke
2
or change their proxy at any time prior to the time it is voted by delivering a written notice of revocation, by delivering a subsequently dated proxy by mail, telephone or the Internet or by attending the Meeting via teleconference and voting in person at the Meeting. If you revoke a previous proxy, your vote will not be counted unless you appear atattend the Meeting via teleconference and vote in person or legally appoint another proxy to vote on your behalf.
If you own your shares through a bank, broker-dealer or other third-party intermediary who holds your shares of record, and you wish to attend the Meeting via teleconference and vote your shares or revoke a previous proxy at the Meeting, you must request a legal proxy from such bank, broker-dealer or other third-party intermediary. If your proxy has not been revoked, the shares represented by the proxy will be cast at the Meeting and any adjournments thereof. Attendance by a shareholder at the Meeting via teleconference does not, in itself, revoke a proxy.
TO ASSURE THE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM AT THE MEETING, PLEASE PROMPTLY EXECUTE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY.PROXY CARD(S). A SELF-ADDRESSED, POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. ALTERNATIVELY, YOU MAY VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR THROUGH THE INTERNET AT THE NUMBER OR WEBSITE ADDRESS PRINTED ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.
3
IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO HELP YOU UNDERSTAND AND VOTE ON THE PROPOSALSPROPOSAL
Below is a brief overview of the subject of each Proposal. Your vote is important, no matter how large or small your holdings may be. Please read the full text of this Joint Proxy Statement, which contains additional information about the Proposals, and keep it for future reference.TO CHANGE THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE FUND
PROPOSAL 1: FROM “DIVERSIFIED” TO ELECT ELEVEN TRUSTEES TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EACH TRUST“NON-DIVERSIFIED”
Introduction
Each of Ivy Funds, Ivy NextShares, InvestEd Portfolios and Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios is a separate management investment company registered under theThe Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). Each Trust is part of the “Fund Complex,” which is comprised of the 45 portfolios within the Ivy Funds (“Ivy Funds”), 3 funds within the Ivy NextShares (“NextShares”), 6 portfolios within the InvestEd Portfolios (“InvestEd”), 28 portfolios within the Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios (“Ivy VIP”) and Ivy High Income Opportunities Fund (IVH) (a closed-end fund). Each current member of the Board is also a member of the Board of Trustees of each other Trust within the Fund Complex.
At the Meeting, shareholders of each Trust will be asked to elect the following 11 Trustee nominees: the eight Current Trustees (James M. Concannon, James D. Gressett, Joseph Harroz, Jr., Glendon E. Johnson, Jr., Frank J. Ross, Jr., Michael G. Smith, Edward M. Tighe, and Henry J. Herrmann); and three new Trustees (H. Jeffrey Dobbs, Sandra Lawrence, and Philip J. Sanders). Under the Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of each Trust (the “Declarations of Trust”), the By-laws for Ivy Funds and NextShares and the Amended and Restated By-laws of InvestEd and Ivy VIP (collectively, the “By-laws”), a Trustee will be elected to serve as a Trustee until he or she dies, resigns or is removed from office.
Which Funds are affected by this Proposal?
The shareholders of all of the Trusts will be entitled to vote at the Meeting on this Proposal being presented for shareholder consideration. Pursuant to the Declarations of Trust, the shareholders of all of the Funds within a Trust will vote on the Proposal collectively, rather than on a fund-by-fund basis.
4
How would approval of the proposal affect the composition of each Board?
After the Meeting, the Board of each Trust would consist of eleven Trustees. Three of the nominees — H. Jeffrey Dobbs, Sandra Lawrence, and Philip J. Sanders — would be added to the Board. Eight of the current Board members — James M. Concannon, James D. Gressett, Joseph Harroz, Jr., Glendon E. Johnson, Jr., Frank J. Ross, Jr., Michael G. Smith, Edward M. Tighe, and Henry J. Herrmann — have previously been elected by shareholders of each Trust or appointed to serve by that Board, and would continue to serve on the Board after the Meeting. Except for Mr. Herrmann and Mr. Sanders, each Trustee would be considered to not be an “interested person” of the Trusts (as such term is defined in the 1940 Act) (the “Independent Trustees”). Because of their affiliation with the adviser of the Funds, Messrs. Herrmann and Sanders would be considered “interested” Trustees.
If the shareholders of any Trust do not approve the Proposal, that Trust’s Board will consider other alternatives.
PROPOSAL 2: TO APPROVE A CHANGE TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE IVY ENERGY FUND, IVY NATURAL RESOURCES FUND, IVY VIP ENERGY AND IVY VIP NATURAL RESOURCES FROM “DIVERSIFIED” TO “NON-DIVERSIFIED”
Introduction
The 1940 Act requires every mutual fund to state, as a fundamental policy, whether it is a “diversified”“diversified” fund or “non-diversified” fund, within the meaning ofas defined in the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act also requires shareholders to approve athat any change in a fund’s fundamental policy and classification fromdiversified to non-diversified first be approved by the fund’s shareholders.
The 1940 Act limits the amount that a diversified fund to a non-diversified fund.
A diversified fund is limited as to the amount it may invest in any single issuer. Under the 1940 Act, a diversified fund must not, with respect to 75% of its total assets, invest in securities of any issuer if, as a result of such investment (i) more than 5% of the value of the fund’s total assets would be invested in securities of any one issuer, or (ii) the fund would hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer. These percentage limitations do not apply to securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities, or to securities issued by other investment companies. With respect to the remaining 25% of its total assets, a diversified fund may invest more than 5% of its total assets in the securities of one issuer. These limits apply at the time a diversified fund purchases a security; a diversified fund may
5
exceed these limits if positions it already holds increase in value relative to the rest of the fund’s holdings. In contrast, a non-diversified fund is not required to meet the standard of a diversified fund; it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in a single issuer or a fewer number of issuers than a diversified fund.
Which Funds are affected by this Proposal?
Proposal 2 relates to four separate Funds: Ivy Energy Fund, Ivy Natural Resources Fund, Ivy VIP Energy and Ivy VIP Natural Resources. Shareholders of each Fund will vote separately on the Proposal, and the approval of the Proposal by one Fund’s shareholders is not contingent on approval of the Proposal by another Fund’s shareholders. However, approval of this Proposal 2 for each of Ivy Natural Resources Fund and Ivy VIP Natural Resources is contingent on shareholders of each such Fund also approving Proposal 3.
What would be the impact of the change in a Fund’s classification, if approved?
By changing each Fund’s classification under the 1940 Act to “non-diversified,” such Funds would have the ability to invest a greater percentage of their respective assets in the obligations or securities of a smaller number of issuers than a diversified fund.
Why are shareholders of these Funds being asked to approve this change?
As explained more fully in Proposal 2 below, Ivy Investment Management Company (“IICO” or the “Adviser”), investment manager of each Fund, believes that changing the classification of the Funds to non-diversified will benefit each Fund’s investment team by giving them the ability to invest a greater percentage of the Fund’s assets in fewer issuers or any one issuer. The change would enable IICO to focus such Funds’ investments on those securities that IICO believes are the most promising. Because IICO would be able to invest larger percentages of a Fund’s assets in the securities of a single issuer, IICO would be able to take more meaningful positions in securities that are its top investment choices. In addition, IICO believes that the proposed change would provide the Ivy Energy Fund, Ivy Natural Resources Fund, Ivy VIP Energy and Ivy VIP Natural Resources with increased flexibility to respond to future investment opportunities.
If the shareholders of a Fund do not approve the Proposal, IICO will continue to manage that Fund as a diversified fund, in accordance with the 1940 Act.
63
PROPOSAL 3: TO APPROVE A CHANGE IN FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT POLICY REGARDING CONCENTRATION FOR IVY NATURAL RESOURCES FUND AND IVY VIP NATURAL RESOURCES
Introduction
The purpose of Proposal 3 is to modify the fundamental investment policy regarding industry concentration for Ivy Natural Resources Fund and Ivy VIP Natural Resources, thereby requiring those Funds to concentrate their investments in securities of issuers that produce, refine, develop, tore, transport or supply energy or industrial products (i.e., building materials, packaging, chemicals, base metals, forest and agricultural products or provide basic services to the natural resources industry). The 1940 Act requires a fund to recite in its registration statement, among other things, any policy to concentrate its investments in a particular industry or group of industries, including whether it reserves the freedom to concentrate investments in a particular industry or group of industries. If a fund reserves this freedom, it must include a statement that indicates the extent to which it intends to concentrate its investments. The SEC has taken the position that a fund that invests more than 25% of its net assets in a particular industry is concentrating its investments in such industry. The 1940 Act further requires a fund to obtain shareholder approval to change its fundamental concentration policy.
Which Funds are affected by this Proposal?
This Proposal relates to Ivy Natural Resources Fund and Ivy VIP Natural Resources.
What would be the impact of the change in a Fund’s fundamental policy regarding concentration, if approved?
These changes would permit each Fund to invest a greater percentage of its assets in the obligations or securities of issuers that produce, refine, develop, store, transport or supply energy or industrial products.
Why are shareholders of these Funds being asked to approve this change?
As explained more fully in Proposal 3 below, IICO believes that changing each Fund’s fundamental concentration policy will benefit each Fund’s investment team by giving them the ability to invest a greater percentage of the Fund’s assets in issuers that produce, refine, develop, store, transport or supply energy or industrial products. The change would
7
enable IICO to focus these Funds’ investments on those securities that IICO believes are the most promising. Because IICO would be able to invest larger percentages of these Funds’ assets in the securities of issuers that produce, refine, develop, store, transport or supply energy or industrial products, IICO would be able to take more meaningful positions in securities that are its top investment choices. In addition, IICO believes that the proposed change would provide these Funds with increased flexibility to respond to future investment opportunities.
VOTING PROCEDURES
Why did you send me this booklet?
You are receiving this booklet because you were a shareholder of one or more Funds as of the close of business on January 30, 2019 (the “Record Date”). This booklet includes the Joint Proxy Statement. It provides you with information you should review before providing voting instructions on the matters listed above. The words “you” and “shareholder” are used in this Joint Proxy Statement to refer to the person or entity that has voting rights or is being asked to provide voting instructions in connection with the shares.
Who is asking for my vote?
The Board has sent a Joint Proxy Statement to you and all other shareholders of record who have a beneficial interest in a Trust as of the Record Date. The Board is soliciting your vote for a Joint Special Meeting of the Trust shareholders.
Who is eligible to vote?
Shareholders holding an investment in shares of any of the Trusts as of the close of business on the Record Date are eligible to vote on Proposal 1. Owners of shares of Ivy Energy Fund or Ivy VIP Energy as of the close of business on the Record Date are eligible to vote on Proposal 2, and owners of shares of Ivy Natural Resources Fund or Ivy VIP Natural Resources as of the close of business on the Record Date are eligible to vote on Proposals 2 and 3. Shareholders of the Trusts on the Record Date will be entitled to one vote for each share (and a proportional fractional vote for each fraction of a share held. No shares have cumulative voting rights in the election of Trustees.
Ivy VIP sells its shares only to the separate accounts of certain select insurance companies (“Participating Insurance Companies”) to fund certain variable life insurance policies and variable annuity contracts
8
(“Policies”). The shares of Ivy VIP are currently sold only to variable life insurance separate accounts and variable annuity separate accounts (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Variable Accounts”) as a funding vehicle for the Policies offered by the Variable Accounts of Participating Insurance Companies. Each of the Variable Accounts has a sub-account (“Sub-Account”), the assets of which are invested in shares of Ivy VIP.
Owners of the Policies issued by each Participating Insurance Company (“Policyowners”) who select a portfolio for investment through a Variable Account have a beneficial interest in an Ivy VIP Fund, but do not invest directly in or hold shares of an Ivy VIP Fund. The Participating Insurance Company that uses an Ivy VIP Fund as an investment option is, in most cases, the actual shareholder of the Ivy VIP Fund and, as the legal owner of the Ivy VIP Fund’s shares, has voting power with respect to the shares. Each Participating Insurance company is the legal owner of all Ivy VIP Fund shares held by the Variable Accounts of that Participating Insurance Company. In accordance with its view of applicable law, each Participating Insurance Company is soliciting voting instructions from its Policyowners with respect to all matters to be acted upon at the Meeting. The Policyowners permitted to give instructions for the Ivy VIP Fund and the number of Fund shares for which instructions may be given will be determined as of the Record Date for the Meeting. The numbers of votes which a Policyowner has the right to instruct will be calculated separately for each Variable Account. That number will be determined by applying the Policyowner’s percentage interest, if any, in the Sub-Account holding shares of the Fund to the total number of votes attributable to that Sub-Account. All Ivy VIP Fund shares held by the Variable Accounts of a Participating Insurance Company will be voted in accordance with voting instructions received from its Policyowners. Each Participating Insurance Company will vote Ivy VIP Fund shares attributable to its Policies as to which no timely instructions are received, and any Ivy VIP Fund shares held by that Participating Insurance Company as to which Policyowners have no beneficial interest, in proportion to the voting instructions, including abstentions, which are received with respect to its Policies participating in the Ivy VIP Fund. The effect of such proportional voting is that a small number of Policyowners may determine the outcome of the vote.
For purposes of this Joint Proxy Statement, the terms “shareholder,” “you,” and “your” may refer to Policyowners and to Variable Accounts and Participating Insurance Companies, as direct owners of shares of the Ivy VIP Funds, and any other direct shareholders of the Funds, unless the context otherwise requires.
9
How do I vote?
Shareholders who are eligible to vote and who intend to attend the Meeting in person will need to bring proof of share ownership, such as a shareholder statement or letter from a custodian or broker-dealer confirming ownership, as of the Record Date, and a valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, for admission to the Meeting.
If you do not expect to be present at the Meeting and wish to vote your shares, please vote your proxy in accordance with the instructions included on the enclosed proxy card(s). If your proxy is properly returned, shares represented by it will be voted at the Meeting in accordance with your instructions for the Proposals. If your proxy is properly executed and returned and no choice is specified on the proxy with respect to the Proposals, the proxy will be voted FOR the approval of the Proposal(s) you are entitled to vote and in accordance with the judgment of the person appointed as proxy upon any other matter that may properly come before the Meeting. Shareholders who execute proxies may revoke or change their proxy at any time prior to the time it is voted by delivering a written notice of revocation, by delivering a subsequently dated proxy by mail, telephone or the Internet or by attending and voting in person at the Meeting. If you revoke a previous proxy, your vote will not be counted unless you appear at the Meeting and vote in person or legally appoint another proxy to vote on your behalf.
If you own your shares through a bank, broker-dealer or other third-party intermediary who holds your shares of record, and you wish to attend the Meeting and vote your shares or revoke a previous proxy at the Meeting, you must request a legal proxy from such bank, broker-dealer or other third-party intermediary. If your proxy has not been revoked, the shares represented by the proxy will be cast at the Meeting and any adjournments thereof. Attendance by a shareholder at the Meeting does not, in itself, revoke a proxy.
How can I obtain more information about the Trusts?
You may speak to a representative of Mediant Communications, who can assist you with any questions, by calling 1-844-288-1895. Copies of each Trust’s Annual Report for the most recently completed fiscal year previously have been mailed to shareholders. This Joint Proxy Statement should be read in conjunction with each Annual Report. You can obtain copies of the Annual Reports, without charge, by writing to the respective Trust or to Ivy Distributors, Inc. (“IDI”) at 6300 Lamar
10
Avenue, P. O. Box 29217, Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66201, or by calling 800-777-6472. You should receive the reports within three business days of your request. Copies of these reports are also available free of charge at www.ivyinvestments.com.
11
PROPOSAL 1
TO ELECT ELEVEN (11) TRUSTEES TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EACH TRUST
Summary
At the Meeting, shareholders of each Trust will be asked to elect the following 11 nominees to serve as Trustees on the Board of each Trust: James M. Concannon, Jeffrey Dobbs, James D. Gressett, Joseph Harroz, Jr., Henry J. Herrmann, Glendon E. Johnson, Jr., Sandra Lawrence, Frank J. Ross, Jr., Philip J. Sanders, Michael G. Smith and Edward M. Tighe.
The Board currently consists of eight Trustees: James M. Concannon, James D. Gressett, Joseph Harroz, Jr., Glendon E. Johnson, Jr., Frank J. Ross, Jr., Michael G. Smith, Edward M. Tighe, and Henry J. Herrmann as Trustees (the “Current Trustees”). Certain of the Current Trustees were elected to a Board of a Trust by a vote of such Trust’s shareholders, and others were appointed by a Board to serve as a Trustee, as set forth in the table below.
Each Current Trustee, except for Mr. Herrmann, is considered not to be an “interested person” of each Trust (as such term is defined in the “1940 Act”) (an “Independent Trustee”). Mr. Herrmann is considered to be an “interested person” of each Trust (an “Interested Trustee”) because of his affiliation with Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. (“WDR”) or its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Should Mr. Dobbs and Ms. Lawrence be elected to the Board of each Trust by that Trust’s shareholders, it is expected that each would qualify as an Independent Trustee. Should Mr. Sanders be elected to the Board of each Trust by that Trust’s shareholders, it is expected that he would qualify as an Interested Trustee by virtue of his service as an officer of IICO.
At a meeting held on November 14, 2018, the Board, at the recommendation of the Trusts’ Governance Committee, nominated each trustee candidate for election to the Board of each Trust. Mr. Dobbs and Ms. Lawrence were recommended by the current Independent Trustees.
Information about the Trustee Nominees
The persons named in the accompanying form of proxy intend to vote at the Meeting (unless directed not to vote)FOR the election of each Trustee nominee set forth below. All Trustee nominees have indicated that they will serve on the Board, and the Board has no reason to believe
12
that any of them will become unavailable to continue to serve as Trustees. If the nominees are unavailable to serve for any reason, the persons named as proxies will vote for such other nominees nominated by the Independent Trustees. Under the Declarations of Trust and By-laws, a Trustee may serve as a Trustee until he or she dies, resigns or is removed from office.
Independent Trustee Nominees
The nine Independent Trustee nominees, their term of office and length of time served (or the length of time served should they be elected by shareholders, as applicable), their principal business occupations during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen by the Trustee nominees (or the number of portfolios they will oversee should they be elected by shareholders, as applicable) and other directorships, if any, held by the Trustee nominees are shown below.
13
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
14
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
15
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
16
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
18
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
19
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
20
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
Interested Trustee Nominees
The two Interested Trustee nominees, their term of office and length of time served (or the length of time served should they be elected by shareholders), their principal business occupations during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen by the Trustee nominees (or the number of portfolios they will oversee should they be elected by shareholders) and other directorships, if any, held by the Trustee nominees are shown below.
With regard to Ivy Funds, InvestEd, and Ivy VIP, Mr. Herrmann is an Interested Trustee by virtue of his former engagement as an officer of WDR or its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including each Fund’s investment manager, IICO, each Fund’s principal underwriter, IDI, and each Fund’s shareholder servicing and accounting services agent, Waddell & Reed Services Company, doing business as WI Services Company (“WISC”), as well as by virtue of his personal ownership in shares of WDR. With regard to NextShares, Mr. Herrmann is “interested”
21
by virtue of his former engagement as an officer of WDR or its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including NextShares’ investment manager, IICO, as well as by virtue of his personal ownership in shares of WDR.
If elected, Mr. Sanders would be an Interested Trustee by virtue of his position as Chief Executive Officer of IICO and his personal ownership of shares of WDR. Mr. Sanders was Vice President of the Ivy Funds and NextShares since 2006, and of the certain of the other Funds in the Fund Complex since 1998, until his appointment as President in August 2016.
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
22
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
23
Officers
The Board has appointed officers who are responsible for the day-to-day business decisions based on policies it has established. The executive officers of the Trust, their term of office and length of time served and their principal business occupations during the past five years are also shown below.
|
|
|
| |||
| ||||||
| ||||||
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| ||||
|
| |||||
|
|
Trustee Qualifications
The Governance Committee of the Board of the Trusts is responsible for identifying, evaluating and recommending candidates to the Board. The Governance Committee reviews the background and the educational, business and professional experience of candidates and the candidates’ expected contributions to the Board. Although the Board has not adopted a formal diversity policy, the Board nevertheless believes that the different perspectives, viewpoints, professional experience, education, and individual qualities of each director contribute to the Board’s diversity of experiences and bring a variety of complementary skills. It is the Trustees’ belief that this allows the Board, as a whole, to oversee the business of the Trusts in a manner consistent with the best interests of the Trusts’ shareholders.
25
The Board has determined that each Trustee nominee is qualified to serve on the Board because of his or her specific attributes, including prior experience, background and skills. The following is a summary of various qualifications, experiences and skills of each Trustee nominee that that led to the Board’s conclusion that the nominee should serve as a Trustee on the Board.
James M. Concannon. Mr. Concannon has organizational management experience as the dean of a law school. He has served as an officer and on the boards of non-profit organizations. He has multiple years of service as a Trustee to the Fund Complex. The Board concluded that Mr. Concannon is suitable to serve as Trustee because of his academic background and the length of his service as a Trustee to the Trusts within the Fund Complex.
H. Jeffrey Dobbs. Mr. Dobbs has over 35 years of experience in the automotive, industrial manufacturing, financial services and consumer sectors. He has also served as a partner in a public accounting firm. Mr. Dobbs holds a degree in accounting from Valparaiso University. The Board concluded that Mr. Dobbs is suitable to act as Trustee because of his extensive work in the global professional services industry, as well as his educational background.
James D. Gressett. Mr. Gressett has served as the CEO of a closely-held corporation. He also has served as an accountant and partner in a public accounting firm. Mr. Gressett also has been a member and chairman of the boards of several closely-held corporations and charitable organizations. Mr. Gressett holds a B.B.A. of Accountancy degree from the University of Texas at Austin. He has multiple years of service as a Trustee to the Fund Complex. The Board concluded that Mr. Gressett is suitable to serve as Trustee because of his work experience, his academic background, his service on other corporate and charitable boards and the length of his service as a Trustee to the Trusts within the Fund Complex.
Joseph Harroz, Jr. Mr. Harroz serves as Dean of the College of Law and Vice President of a state university, and also serves as a director of a bank. He also has served as a president and director of a publicly traded company and as General Counsel to a state university system. Mr. Harroz holds a B.A. degree from the University of Oklahoma and a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center. Mr. Harroz has multiple years of service as a Trustee to the Fund Complex. The Board concluded that Mr. Harroz is suitable to serve as Trustee because of his educational background, his work experience and the length of his service as a Trustee to the Trusts within the Fund Complex.
26
Henry J. Herrmann. Mr. Herrmann has extensive experience in the investment management business, both as a portfolio manager and as a member of senior management, and experience as a director of a publicly held company. He has multiple years of service as a Trustee and officer to the Fund Complex. The Board concluded that Mr. Herrmann is suitable to serve as Trustee because of his academic background, his extensive work experience in the financial services and investment management industry and the length of his service as a Trustee to the Trusts within the Fund Complex.
Glendon E. Johnson, Jr. Mr. Johnson practiced law for over 30 years, specializing in corporate finance, securities and mergers and acquisitions, including representing and advising financial services companies and investment advisers and their boards. In addition, for over twelve years, he was involved in the acquisition, sale, financing, and daily business affairs of several financial service companies, including investment managers. He serves as a Director of the Thomas Foundation for Cancer Research. Mr. Johnson holds an Honors B.A. of Economics and Business from the University of Utah, and a J.D. from the University of Texas Law School at Austin, where he was a member and note and comment editor of the Texas Law Review. He has multiple years of service as a Trustee to the Fund Complex. The Board concluded that Mr. Johnson is suitable to serve as Trustee because of his extensive legal and business experience, academic background and the length of his service as a Trustee to the Trusts within the Fund Complex.
Sandra Lawrence. Ms. Lawrence has been a member and chair of the boards of several closely-held corporations and charitable organizations. Ms. Lawrence holds an A.B. from Vassar College, as well as master’s degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard Business School. The Board concluded that Ms. Lawrence is suitable to serve as Trustee because of her work experience, her academic background and her service on corporate and charitable boards.
Frank J. Ross, Jr. Mr. Ross has experience as a business attorney and as the head of the business department of a major law firm. He has served as a member of a state banking board and on the boards of a private university, a private secondary school and various non-profit organizations. He has multiple years of service as a Trustee to the Fund Complex. The Board concluded that Mr. Ross is suitable to serve as Trustee because of his work experience and the length of his service as a Trustee to the Trusts within the Fund Complex.
Philip J. Sanders. Mr. Sanders has extensive experience in the investment management business as a member of senior management.
27
He has multiple years of service as an officer of the Trusts and as an officer of other mutual funds. The Board concluded that Mr. Sanders is suitable to serve as Trustee because of his extensive work experience in the financial services and investment management industry and the length of his service as an officer of the Trusts.
Michael G. Smith. Mr. Smith has over 40 years of experience in the financial services and investment management industry. He has served as a member and chairman of the boards of several mutual funds and charitable and educational organizations. Mr. Smith is a Chartered Financial Analyst and holds a B.B.A. of Finance degree and an M.B.A. degree from Southern Methodist University. He has multiple years of service as a Trustee to the Fund Complex. The Board concluded that Mr. Smith is suitable to act as Trustee because of his extensive work experience in the financial services and investment management industry, his educational and charitable organization experience, his educational background and the length of his service as a Trustee to the Trusts within the Fund Complex.
Edward M. Tighe. Mr. Tighe has extensive experience in the mutual fund and information technology industries. He has held executive positions with U.S. mutual fund companies and served as a lead independent trustee on a different mutual fund board. Mr. Tighe holds a B.S. of Finance degree from Boston University. He has multiple years of service as a Trustee to the Fund Complex. The Board concluded that Mr. Tighe is suitable to serve as Trustee because of his academic background, his extensive business experience and the length of his service as a Trustee to the Trusts within the Fund Complex.
Board Structure and Related Matters
The Trusts are governed by the Board, which is responsible for the overall management of the Trusts and the Funds. Such responsibility includes general oversight and review of the Funds’ investment activities, in accordance with Federal law and the law of the State of Delaware, as well as the stated policies of the Funds. The Board has appointed officers of the Trusts and delegated to them the management of the day-to-day operations of the Funds, based on policies reviewed and approved by the Board, with general oversight by the Board.
Under the Declarations of Trust and By-laws, a Trustee may serve as a Trustee until he or she dies, resigns or is removed from office. The Trusts are not required to hold annual meetings of shareholders for the election or re-election of Trustees or for any other purpose, and do not intend to do so. Delaware law permits shareholders to remove Trustees under certain circumstances and requires the Trusts to assist in shareholder communications.
28
The Board currently is composed of the eight Current Trustees, seven of whom are Independent Trustees. The Board believes that having a majority of Independent Trustees on the Board is appropriate and in the best interests of the Trusts’ shareholders. The Board also has elected Joseph Harroz, Jr., an Independent Trustee, to serve as Independent Chair of the Board. In that regard, Mr. Harroz’s responsibilities include: setting an agenda for each meeting of the Board; presiding at all meetings of the Board and of the Independent Trustees; and serving as a liaison with other Trustees, the Trusts’ officers and other management personnel, and counsel. The Independent Chair also performs such other duties as the Board may from time to time determine.
The Board generally holds four regularly scheduled in-person meetings each year. The Board may hold special meetings, as needed, either in person or by telephone, to address matters arising between regular meetings. The Independent Trustees also hold four regularly scheduled in-person meetings each year, during a portion of which management is not present, as well as a special telephonic meeting in connection with the Board’s annual consideration of the Trusts’ management agreements, and may hold special meetings, as needed, either in person or by telephone. During the calendar year 2018, the Board of each Fund met six times. Information relating to the number of times that the Board met during each Fund’s most recent full fiscal year is set forth in Appendix B. No Current Trustee attended less than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of each Board and of each Committee on which the Current Trustee served during each Fund’s most recently completed fiscal year.
The Board has established a committee structure (described below) that includes four standing committees, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Investment Oversight Committee, and the Executive Committee, the first two of which are comprised solely of Independent Trustees. The Board periodically evaluates its structure and composition, as well as various aspects of its operations. The Board believes that its leadership structure, including its Independent Chair position and its committees, is appropriate for the Trusts in light of, among other factors, the asset size and nature of the Trusts, the number of Funds overseen by the Board, the arrangements for the conduct of the Trusts’ operations, the number of Trustees, and the Board’s responsibilities.
Committees of the Board
The Board has established the following standing committees: Audit Committee, Executive Committee, Investment Oversight Committee and
29
Governance Committee. The respective duties and current memberships of the standing committees are set forth below. Information on the number of meetings of each Committee for each Fund’s most recently completed fiscal year is set forth in Appendix B.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee serves as an independent and objective party to monitor the Trusts’ accounting policies, financial reporting and internal control system, as well as the work of the Trusts’ independent registered public accounting firm. The Committee also serves to provide an open avenue of communication among the Trusts’ independent registered public accounting firm, the internal accounting staff of IICO and the Board. The Audit Committee consists of Edward M. Tighe (Chair), James M. Concannon and James D. Gressett.
Executive Committee. The Executive Committee acts as necessary on behalf of the full Board. When the Board is not in session, the Executive Committee has and may exercise any or all of the powers of the Board in the management of the business and affairs of the Funds except the power to increase or decrease the size of, or fill vacancies on, the Board, and except as otherwise provided by law. The Executive Committee consists of Henry J. Herrmann (Chair) and Glendon E. Johnson, Jr.
Investment Oversight Committee.The Investment Oversight Committee reviews, among other things, the investment performance of the Funds, any proposed changes to the Funds’ investment policies, and the Funds’ market trading activities and portfolio transactions. The Investment Oversight Committee consists of Michael G. Smith (Chair), James M. Concannon and Henry J. Herrmann.
Governance Committee. The Governance Committee evaluates, selects and recommends to the Board candidates to serve as Independent Trustees. The Governance Committee will consider candidates for Trustee recommended by Shareholders. Written recommendations with any supporting information should be directed to the Secretary of the Trusts. The Governance Committee also oversees the functioning of the Board and its committees. The Governance Committee consists of Frank J. Ross, Jr. (Chair), Glendon E. Johnson, Jr. and James D. Gressett. The Board has adopted a written charter of the Governance Committee, which is attached as Appendix C.
Risk Oversight
Consistent with its responsibility for oversight of the Trusts and their Funds, the Board oversees the management of risks relating to the administration and operation of the Trusts and the Funds. The Board performs this risk
30
management oversight directly and, as to certain matters, directly through its committees and through its Independent Trustees. The following provides an overview of the principal, but not all, aspects of the Board’s oversight of risk management for the Trusts and the Funds.
In general, a Fund’s risks include, among other things, investment risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, valuation risk, operational risk and regulatory compliance risk. The Board has adopted, and periodically reviews, policies and procedures designed to address these and other risks to the Trusts and the Funds. In addition, under the general oversight of the Board, IICO, any sub-advisers (if applicable) and other service providers to the Trusts have themselves adopted a variety of policies, procedures and controls designed to address particular risks of the Funds. Different processes, procedures and controls are employed with respect to different types of risks.
The Board also oversees risk management for the Trusts and the Funds through review of regular reports, presentations and other information from officers of the Trusts and other persons.
Senior officers of the Trusts, senior officers of IICO, IDI and WISC (collectively, “Waddell”), and the Trusts’ Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) regularly report to the Board on a range of matters, including those relating to risk management. The Board also regularly receives reports from IICO with respect to the investments and securities trading of the Funds, reports from Fund management personnel regarding valuation procedures and reports from management’s Valuation Committee regarding the valuation of particular securities. In addition to regular reports from Waddell, the Board also receives reports regarding other service providers to the Trusts, either directly or through Waddell or the Funds’ CCO, on a periodic or regular basis. At least annually, the Board receives a report from the Funds’ CCO regarding the effectiveness of the Funds’ compliance program. Also, on an annual basis, the Board receives reports, presentations and other information from Waddell in connection with the Board’s consideration of the renewal of each of the Trusts’ agreements with Waddell and the Trusts’ distribution plans under the Rule 12b-1 plan under the 1940 Act for Ivy Funds, InvestEd and Ivy VIP.
Senior officers of the Trusts and senior officers of Waddell also report regularly to the Audit Committee on Fund valuation matters and on the Trusts’ internal controls and accounting and financial reporting policies and practices. Waddell compliance and internal audit personnel also report regularly to the Audit Committee. In addition, the Audit Committee receives regular reports from the Trusts’ independent
31
registered public accounting firm on internal control and financial reporting matters. On at least a quarterly basis, the Independent Trustees meet separately with the Funds’ CCO to discuss matters relating to the Funds’ compliance program.
Selection of Nominees
The Board’s Governance Committee makes Independent Trustee candidate recommendations to the Board pursuant to its charter. The Governance Committee evaluates a candidate’s qualification for Board membership and the independence of such candidate from IICO and other principal service providers.
The Governance Committee evaluates candidates using certain criteria, considering, among other qualities, a high level of integrity, appropriate experience, a commitment to fulfill the fiduciary duties inherent in Board membership, and the extent to which potential candidates possess sufficiently diverse skill sets that would contribute to the Board’s overall effectiveness.
The Governance Committee considers prospective candidates from any reasonable source, including from recommendations by shareholders of the Trusts. The Governance Committee initially evaluates prospective candidates on the basis of preliminary information required of all preliminary candidates, considered in light of the criteria discussed above. Those prospective candidates that appear likely to be able to fill a significant need of the Board would be contacted by a Governance Committee member by telephone to discuss the position; if there appeared to be sufficient interest, an in-person meeting with one or more Governance Committee members would be arranged. If the Governance Committee, based on the results of these contacts, believed it had identified a viable candidate, it would air the matter with the full group of Independent Trustees for input.
Any request by management to meet with the prospective candidate would be given appropriate consideration. The Trusts have not paid a fee to third parties to assist in finding nominees.
Shareholders seeking to recommend one or more candidates to the Board should direct the names of such candidates they wish to be considered to the attention of the Trusts’ Governance Committee, in care of the Trusts’ Secretary, at the address of the Trusts listed on the front page of this Joint Proxy Statement. Such candidates will be considered with any other trustee candidates on the basis of the same criteria described above used to consider and evaluate candidates recommended by other sources.
32
For candidates to serve as Independent Trustees, independence from IICO, its affiliates and other principal service providers is critical, as is an independent and questioning mindset. The Governance Committee also considers whether the prospective candidates’ workloads would allow them to attend the vast majority of Board meetings, be available for service on Board committees, and devote the additional time and effort necessary to keep up with Board matters and the rapidly changing regulatory environment in which the Trusts operate. Different substantive areas may assume greater or lesser significance at particular times, in light of the Board’s present composition and the Governance Committee’s (or the Board’s) perceptions about future issues and needs.
Ownership of Fund Shares
Set forth in Appendix D is information regarding shares of the Funds beneficially owned by each Trustee nominee as of December 31, 2018, as determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as well as the aggregate dollar range of shares owned by each Trustee nominee of Funds within the Fund Complex. An Independent Trustee may elect to defer a portion of his or her annual compensation, which deferred amount is deemed to be invested in shares of funds within the Fund Complex. The amounts listed in Appendix D as “owned” shares include any shares in which the Trustee’s deferred compensation is deemed invested by a Trustee.
To the best of the Trusts’ knowledge, as of December 31, 2018, no person owned beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of any Fund’s securities, except as set out in Appendix E. As of that date, all of the Trustees and officers of the Trust, as a group, beneficially owned less than 1% of the outstanding shares of each class of the Funds. In addition, no Trustee or nominee purchased or sold any securities of IICO or its affiliates during the past fiscal year.
Compensation
The fees paid to the Trustees are allocated among the funds in the Fund Complex based on each fund’s relative asset size. Information relating to compensation paid to the Trustees for each Fund’s most recent fiscal year is set forth in Appendix F.
Required Vote
Shareholders of each Trust, including each Fund and class thereof, will vote on a trust-by-trust basis to elect Trustees to that Trust’s Board. For each Trust, the presence at the Meeting, in person or by proxy, of one-third of the outstanding shares of such Trust shall be sufficient to
33
constitute a quorum for that Trust. Trustees are elected by the affirmative vote of a plurality of shares present at the Meeting, either in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote, at which quorum is present. This means that the 11 candidates who receive the largest number of votes will be elected as trustees. In the election of trustees, votes may be cast in favor of a candidate or withheld.
THE BOARD, INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES, UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT SHAREHOLDERS OF EACH TRUST VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE TRUSTEES NOMINEES.
34
PROPOSAL 2
TO APPROVE A CHANGE IN CLASSIFICATION OF IVY ENERGY FUND, IVY NATURAL
RESOURCES FUND, IVY VIP ENERGY AND IVY VIP NATURAL RESOURCES
FROM DIVERSIFIED TO NON-DIVERSIFIED
Introduction
The 1940 Act requires every mutual fund to state as a fundamental policy whether it is a “diversified” fund or “non-diversified” fund within the meaning of the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act also requires shareholders to approve a change in a fund’s fundamental policy and classification from a diversified fund to a non-diversified fund.
A diversified fund is limited as to the amount it may invest in any single issuer. Under the 1940 Act, a diversified fund must not, with respect to 75% of its total assets, invest in securities of any issuer if, as a result of such investment (i) more than 5% of the value of the fund’s total assets would be invested in securities of any one issuer, or (ii) the fund would hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer. These percentage limitations do not apply to securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities, or to securities issued by other investment companies. With respect to the remaining 25% of its total assets, a diversified fund may invest more than 5% of its total assets in the securities of one issuer. These limits apply at the time a diversified fund purchases a security; a diversified fund may exceed these limits if positions it already holds increase in value relative to the rest of the fund’s holdings. In contrast, a non-diversified fund is not required to meet the standard of a diversified fund; it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in a single issuer or a fewer number of issuers than a diversified fund.
Proposal
Each of Ivy EnergyThe Fund Ivy Natural Resources Fund, Ivy VIP Energy and Ivy VIP Natural Resources (for this Proposal, the “Funds”) currently is classified as a diversified fund. Shareholders of each Fund are being asked to approve changing the Fund’s classification from a diversified fund to a non-diversified, fund, as defined underin the 1940 Act. IICO,Act, by eliminating the Fund’s existing fundamental investment restriction concerning diversification, which prohibits the Fund from investing in securities in amounts that exceed the limits that the 1940 Act imposes on diversified funds. Ivy Investment Management Company (“IICO” or the “Adviser”), investment manager of eachthe Fund, believes that changing eachthe Fund’s classification to non-diversified will benefit the Fund’s Fund by giving its investment team by giving it the ability to invest a greater percentage of the Fund’sFund assets
35
in fewer issuers or any one issuer. The change would enable IICOthe Adviser to focus the Funds’Fund’s investments on those securities that IICOthe Adviser believes are the most promising. Because IICOthe Adviser would be able to invest larger percentages of athe Fund’s assets in the securities of a single issuer, IICOthe Adviser would be able to take more meaningful positions in securities that are its top investment choices. In addition, IICOthe Adviser believes that the proposed change would provide these Fundsthe Fund with increased flexibility to respond to future investment opportunities.
However, investing a larger percentage of athe Fund’s assets in any one issuer could increase the Fund’s risk of loss and its share price volatility, because the value of its shares would be more susceptible to adverse events affecting that issuer. If IICOthe Fund takes a larger position in an issuer that subsequently has an adverse return, athe Fund may have a greater loss than it would have had if IICOit had diversified such Fund’sits investments. IICOThe portfolio managers would use this increased investment flexibility to take larger positionsinvest more assets of the Fund in the securities of a single issuer only if and when it believesthey believe that doing so justifies the risks involved.
IICO
4
The Adviser does not expect athe proposed change in the Fund’s classification of a Fundat this time to materially affect the manner in which it conducts the Fund’s investment program, is conducted at this time, as reflected in the respective Fund’sTrust’s current prospectus and statement of additional information. Other than the change in athe Fund’s classification from diversified to non-diversified, IICO the Adviser and the Board do not propose or anticipate any material change in the management of the FundsFund if the Proposal is approved. Any future material changes to the management of athe Fund in will require Board consideration by the respective Board and disclosure in suchthe Fund’s prospectus or statement of additional information, as appropriate.
In addition, eachthe Fund is now (and will remain) subject to the diversification rules of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Revenue Code”). These rules provide that, to maintain favorable tax treatment, eachthe Fund must invest at least 50% of its total assets so that no more than 5% of its total assets is invested in the securities of any issuer, and so that it holds no more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any issuer. With respect to the remaining 50% of its total assets, eachthe Fund is limited to investing 25% in the securities of a single issuer. These limits apply only as of the end of each quarter of eachthe Fund’s fiscal year, so the FundsFund may actually havehold a higher concentrationgreater percentage of its assets in ana single issuer during periods between the ends of theirits fiscal quarters. However, IICOthe Adviser has no current intention of investing the Fund in the securities of any single issuer beyond the Revenue Code limits. Like the 1940 Act limits, the Revenue Code limits do not apply to securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities, or to securities issued by other investment companies.
36
If shareholders of athe Fund approve the Proposal, the change in thatthe Fund’s classification from diversified to non-diversified will become effective when the Fund’s registration statement is revised or supplemented to reflect the change, which IICO anticipates will occur on or about April 30, 2019.change. If shareholders of athe Fund do not approve the Proposal, that Fund will continue to operate as a “diversified” fund.
Required Vote
Approval of the Proposal requireswill require the affirmative vote of the holders of a “1940 Act majority”“majority of the outstanding voting securitiessecurities” of each Fund. For these purposes, a “1940the Fund, which is defined in the 1940 Act majority” isas the vote of (1)lesser of: (a) 67% or more of the voting securities of a Fund entitled to vote on the Proposal that arefund present at the Meeting,shareholder meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding sharesvoting securities of a fund are present in person or represented by proxy, or (2)(b) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities entitled to vote on the Proposal, whichever is less.of a fund.
The Funds will vote separately on the Proposal. This means that approval of the Proposal by shareholders of one Fund is not contingent upon approval of the Proposal by shareholders of the other Funds. If one Fund approves the Proposal and the other Funds do not, the Fund whose shareholders approved the Proposal will change its classification to “non-diversified,” while the other Funds will remain diversified.
5
THE BOARD, INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES, UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT SHAREHOLDERS OF EACHTHE FUND VOTE “FOR“FOR” THE PROPOSAL.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING
Record Date
Shareholders of record of the Fund as of the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Meeting. Shareholders of the Fund are entitled to one vote for each share and a fractional vote for each fractional share that they own. On the Record Date, the Fund had 76,624,939.736 shares issued and outstanding.
Quorum, Voting and Adjournment
Quorum. The presence of one-third of the outstanding shares of the Fund entitled to vote at the Meeting shall constitute a quorum at the Meeting for purposes of conducting business at the Meeting.
Voting. Instructions regarding how to vote via telephone or the Internet are included on the enclosed proxy card(s). The required control number for Internet and telephone voting also is printed on the enclosed proxy card(s). The control number is used to match proxy cards with shareholders’ respective accounts and to ensure that, if multiple proxy cards are executed, shares are voted in accordance with the proxy card bearing the latest date. All shares represented by properly executed proxies received prior to the Meeting will be voted at the Meeting in accordance with the instructions marked thereon or otherwise as provided therein. If any other business is brought before the Meeting, your shares will be voted at the proxies’ discretion. If you require additional information regarding the proxy, you may contact our proxy solicitor, DCP.
If you participate in the Meeting via teleconference and wish to vote at that time, you will be able to do so. If you intend to participate in the Meeting and you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other custodian, you will be required to establish satisfactory proof of ownership of shares of the Fund to gain admission to the Meeting. You may do so by following the instructions set forth in these Proxy Materials. If you hold your shares in a brokerage account or through a bank or other nominee, you may not be able to vote at the Meeting unless you have previously requested and obtained a “legal proxy” from your broker, bank or other nominee and present it at the Meeting.
6
Adjournment. In the event that a quorum is not present at the Meeting, or if there are insufficient votes to approve the Proposal by the time of the Meeting, the proxies, or their substitutes, or the chairman of the Meeting may propose that the Meeting be adjourned one or more times to permit further solicitation. Any adjournment by the shareholders requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total number of shares that are present in person or by proxy when the adjournment is being voted on. If a quorum is present, the proxies will vote in favor of any such adjournment all shares that they are entitled to vote in favor of the Proposal and will vote against any such adjournment any shares for which they are directed to vote against the Proposal. The proxies will not vote any shares for which they are directed to abstain from voting on the Proposal.
Voting Rights
The Fund sells its shares only to the separate accounts of certain select insurance companies (“Participating Insurance Companies”) to fund certain variable life insurance policies and variable annuity contracts (“Policies”). The shares of the Fund are currently sold only to variable life insurance separate accounts and variable annuity separate accounts (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Variable Accounts”) as a funding vehicle for the Policies offered by the Variable Accounts of Participating Insurance Companies. Each of the Variable Accounts has a sub-account (“Sub-Account”), the assets of which are invested in shares of the Fund.
Owners of the Policies issued by each Participating Insurance Company (“Policyowners”) who select the Fund for investment through a Variable Account have a beneficial interest in the Fund, but do not invest directly in or hold shares of the Fund. The Participating Insurance Company that uses the Fund as an investment option is, in most cases, the actual shareholder of the Fund and, as the legal owner of the Fund’s shares, has voting power with respect to the shares. Each Participating Insurance company is the legal owner of all Fund shares held by the Variable Accounts of that Participating Insurance Company. In accordance with its view of applicable law, each Participating Insurance Company is soliciting voting instructions from its Policyowners with respect to all matters to be acted upon at the Meeting. The Policyowners permitted to give instructions for the Fund and the number of Fund shares for which instructions may be given will be determined as of the Record Date for the Meeting. The numbers of votes which a Policyowner has the right to instruct will be calculated separately for each Variable Account. That number is determined by applying the Policyowner’s
7
percentage interest, if any, in the Sub-Account holding shares of the Fund to the total number of votes attributable to that Sub-Account. All Fund shares held by the Variable Accounts of a Participating Insurance Company will be voted in accordance with voting instructions received from its Policyowners. Each Participating Insurance Company will vote Fund shares attributable to its Policies as to which no timely instructions are received, and any Fund shares held by that Participating Insurance Company as to which Policyowners have no beneficial interest, in proportion to the voting instructions, including abstentions, which are received with respect to its Policies participating in the Fund. The effect of such proportional voting is that a small number of Policyowners may determine the outcome of the vote.
Effect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes. For purposes of determining the presence of a quorum for transacting business at the Meeting, abstentions and broker “non-votes” (i.e., shares held by brokers or nominees, typically in “street name,” PROPOSAL 2.as to which (i) instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote and (ii) the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power on a particular matter) will be treated as shares that are present for purposes of determining a quorum. For purposes of determining the approval of the Proposal, abstentions and broker “non-votes” will be treated as shares voted against the Proposal. Accordingly, shareholders are urged to vote or forward their voting instructions promptly.
Solicitation of Proxies
The initial solicitation of proxies will be made by mail. The Adviser has retained DCP as proxy solicitor to assist in the solicitation of proxy votes primarily by contacting shareholders by telephone and facsimile. The proxy solicitor’s services include proxy consulting, mailing, tabulation and solicitation services. DCP anticipates that approximately 10 of its employees or other persons will be involved in soliciting shareholders of the Fund. The cost to the Fund of retaining such proxy solicitor, including printing and mailing costs, is estimated to be approximately $52,000. Costs will vary depending on the number of solicitations made. Additional solicitations may be made by telephone, mail, e-mail, or other personal contact by the Trust’s officers or employees or representatives of IICO or one of its affiliates. The Trust’s officers, and those employees and representatives of IICO or its affiliates who assist in the proxy solicitation, will not receive any compensation for such efforts. In addition, the Trust will request broker-dealer firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners of their shares held of record by such persons.
378
PROPOSAL 3Revocation of Proxies
Shareholders who execute proxy cards via telephone or the Internet may revoke their proxies at any time prior to the time they are voted by giving written notice to the Secretary of the Fund, by delivering a subsequently dated proxy (including via telephone or the Internet) prior to the date of the Meeting or by attending the Meeting via teleconference and voting. Merely attending the Meeting via teleconference, however, will not revoke a previously submitted proxy.
All properly executed and unrevoked proxies received in time for the Meeting will be voted as instructed by shareholders. If you execute your proxy but give no voting instructions, your shares that are represented by proxies will be voted “FOR” the Proposal and, in the proxies’ discretion, “FOR” or “AGAINST” any other business that may properly come before the Meeting.
Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for Meeting to be held August 21, 2020
The Proxy Materials are available at www.eproxyaccess.com/ivyvip20.
OTHER INFORMATION
TO APPROVE A CHANGE TO THE FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT POLICY REGARDINGOwnership of Shares
CONCENTRATION FOR IVY NATURAL RESOURCES FUND AND IVY VIP NATURAL RESOURCES
Introduction
Proposal 3 seeks to modifyTo the fundamental investment policy regarding industry concentration for Ivy Natural Resources Fund and Ivy VIP Natural Resources (collectively for purposesbest of this Proposal, the “Funds”).
The 1940 Act requires a fund to recite in its registration statement, among other things, any policy to concentrate its investments in a particular industry or group of industries, including whether it reserves the freedom to concentrate investments in a particular industry or group of industries. If a fund reserves this freedom, it must include a statement that indicates the extent to which it intends to concentrate its investments. The SEC has taken the position that a fund that invests more than 25% of its net assets in a particular industry is concentrating its investments in such industry. As such, the Funds currently may not invest more than 25% of their assets in any industry, including companies in the natural resources industry.
Because each Fund’s investment policy is “fundamental,” the 1940 Act requires that it may not be changed without approval by the Fund’s shareholders.
38
Proposal
Set forth below are each Fund’s current and proposed new concentration policies:
|
|
| ||
39
|
|
| ||
Under their current policies,knowledge, the Funds cannot invest more than 25% of their assets in a particular industry or group of industries. As a result, IICO is limited in its ability to fully implement its desired portfolio management investment decisions for the Funds. IICO is seeking approval from each Fund’s shareholders to change the Fund’s fundamental investment policy with respect to concentration, because IICO believes that changing such policy will benefit each Fund by enabling its investment team to focus the Funds’ investments on those securities that IICO believes are the most promising. Because IICO would be able to invest larger percentages of these Funds’ assets in certain securities, IICO would be able to take more meaningful positions in securities that are its top investment choices, which would thereby
40
benefit the Funds. In addition, IICO believes that the proposed change would provide these Funds with increased flexibility to respond to future investment opportunities.
In addition, the change in the fundamental policy would permit the Funds’ investment management teams to invest a greater percentage of the Funds’ assets in issuers that produce, refine, develop, store, transport or supply energy or industrial products.IICO believes that it is appropriate that the Funds, as “natural resources” funds that focus on companies in the natural resources sectors of the market, to have the ability to concentrate their investments in the major industries, such as energy and oil and gas exploration, that comprise the natural resources sector. The inability to do so may prevent the Funds from taking maximum advantage of investment opportunities within such industries and may put them at a competitive disadvantage with other natural resource funds that may so concentrate.
IICO does not expect the change in the Funds’ concentration policy to materially affect the manner in which the Fund’s investment program is conducted at this time. The Board considered the impact such a change would have on each Fund’s potential for return, as well as its risk profile. The Board considered that to the extent a Fund concentrates in a particular industry or group of industries, financial, economic, business, and other developments affecting issuers in that industry or group of industries will have a greater effect on the Fund than if it did not concentrate. However, the Board is not proposing or anticipating any material change in the management of the Funds if the Proposal is approved.
Iffollowing shareholders of a Fund approve the Proposal, the change in that Fund’s investment policy as set in the table above will become effective when the Fund’s registration statement is revisedrecord owned 5% or supplemented to reflect the change, which IICO anticipates will occur on or about April 30, 2019. If shareholders of a Fund do not approve the Proposal, that Fund will continue to operate under its current fundamental investment concentration policy.
Required Vote
Approval of the Proposal requires a “1940 Act majority”more of the outstanding voting securities of each Fund. For these purposes, a “1940 Act majority” is the vote of (1) 67% or moreshares of the voting securitiesFund as of the Record Date:
Shareholder Name, City and State | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||
United Investors Life Variable Universal Life Birmingham, AL | 10,872,533.792 | 14.19 | % | |||||
Bank of New York Mellon Ivy Funds - VIP Pathfinder Moderately Aggressive Fund Master Account Shawnee Mission, KS | 10,371,702.336 | 13.54 | % | |||||
Nationwide Life Insurance Company Columbus, OH | 9,816,403.023 | 12.81 | % | |||||
Bank of New York Mellon Ivy Funds - VIP Pathfinder Moderate Managed Volatility Fund Master Account Shawnee Mission, KS | 8,048,758.267 | 10.50 | % | |||||
Bank of New York Mellon Ivy Funds - VIP Pathfinder Moderate Fund Master Account Shawnee Mission, KS | 7,677,408.613 | 10.02 | % |
9
Shareholder Name, City and State | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||
Minnesota Life Insurance Company St. Paul, MN | 4,978,360.271 | 6.50 | % | |||||
Nationwide Life Insurance Company Columbus, OH | 4,731,417.619 | 6.17 | % | |||||
Nationwide Life Insurance Company Columbus, OH | 4,359,755.574 | 5.69 | % | |||||
United Investors Life Advantage II Birmingham, AL | 3,907,343.118 | 5.10 | % |
As of the Record Date, all of the Trustees and officers of the Trust, as a Fund entitled to vote on the Proposal that are present at the Meeting, if the holders of moregroup, owned less than 50%1% of the outstanding shares are present or represented by proxy, or (2) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities entitledFund.
Service Providers
Adviser. Ivy Investment Management Company, 6300 Lamar Avenue, Overland Park, Kansas 66202. IICO is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc., a publicly held company located at the same address.
Underwriter. Ivy Distributors, Inc., 6300 Lamar Avenue, Overland Park, Kansas 66202.
Custodian. The Bank of New York Mellon, One Wall Street, New York, New York 10286.
Shareholder Servicing Agent and Accounting Services Agent. WI Services Company, 6300 Lamar Avenue, Overland Park, Kansas 66202.
Shareholder Reports
The Fund’s Annual Report for the most recently completed fiscal year previously has been mailed to vote onshareholders. This Proxy Statement should be read in conjunction with the Proposal, whicheverAnnual Report. You can obtain the Annual Report, without charge, by writing Ivy Client Services at P.O. Box 291722, Kansas City, Missouri 64121-9722, Attn: Investor Services & Support, or by calling toll free 1-800-777-6472. You should receive the reports within three business days of your request. The Annual Report also is less.available via the Internet at the Fund’s website, www.ivyinvestments.com.
Householding
To avoid sending duplicate copies of materials to households, the Fund may mail only one copy of this Proxy Statement to shareholders
4110
The Funds will vote separatelyhaving the same last name and address on the Proposal. This means that approval of the Proposal by shareholders of one Fund is not contingent upon approval of the Proposal by shareholders of the other Fund. If one Fund approves the Proposal and the other Fund does not,Fund’s records, unless the Fund whose shareholders approvedhas received contrary instructions from a shareholder. The consolidation of these mailings benefits the Proposal will change its fundamental investment policy regarding concentration, asFund through reduced mailing expenses. If a shareholder wants to receive multiple copies of these materials, the shareholder should make a request by writing to Ivy Distributors, Inc. at the address set forth in the table above, while the other Fund’s policy will not change.
THE BOARD, INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES, UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT SHAREHOLDERS OF EACH FUND VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 3.above.
OTHER BUSINESS
The Board does not intend to present any other business at the Meeting. If, however,However, if any other matters are properly brought before the Meeting, the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy card will vote thereon in accordance with their judgment.
The Trusts generally areFund does not required to hold annual meetings of shareholders, and the Trusts currently do not intend to hold such meetings unless certain specified shareholder actions are required to be taken under the 1940 Act or a Trust’s charter documents.meetings. Any shareholder who wishes to submit proposals to be considered at a special meeting of athe Fund’s shareholders should send such proposals to the Secretary of the relevant Fund at 6300 Lamar Avenue, P.O. Box 29217, Shawnee Mission,Overland Park, Kansas 66201.66202. Any shareholder proposal intended to be presented at any future meeting of athe Fund’s shareholders must be received by suchthe Fund at its principal office at a reasonable time before the solicitation of proxies for such meeting in order for such proposal to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement relating to such meeting. Moreover, inclusion of any such proposals is subject to limitations under the federal securities laws. Persons named as proxies for any subsequent shareholders’ meeting will vote in their discretion with respect to proposals submitted on an untimely basis.
Shareholders who wish to send communications to the Board or the specific members of the Board should submit the communication in writing to the attention of the Secretary of the relevant Fund, at the address in the preceding paragraph, identifying the correspondence as intended for the Board of the Fund or a specified member of the Board. The Secretary will maintain a copy of any such communication and will promptly forward it to the Board or the specified member of the Board, as appropriate.
By order of the Board,
42
INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETINGJennifer K. Dulski
Record DateSecretary
Shareholders of record of the Trusts as of the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Meeting. Shareholders of the Trusts on the Record Date will be entitled to one vote for each share and a fractional vote for each fractional share that they own. No shares have cumulative voting rights in the election of Trustees. The number of shares that you may vote is the total of the number shown on the proxy card accompanying this Joint Proxy Statement. Appendix A sets forth the number of shares issued and outstanding for each class of each Fund as of the Record Date.
Revocation of Proxies
Any shareholder giving a proxy has the power to revoke it by mail (addressed to the Secretary at the principal executive office of the Trusts at the address shown at the beginning of this Joint Proxy Statement) or in person at the Meeting, by executing a superseding proxy or by submitting a notice of revocation to the relevant Fund. A superseding proxy may also be executed by voting via telephone or Internet. The superseding proxy need not be voted using the same method (mail, telephone, or Internet) as the original proxy vote.
All properly executed and unrevoked proxies received in time for the Meeting will be voted as instructed by shareholders. If you execute your proxy but give no voting instructions, your shares that are represented by proxies will be voted “FOR” the Proposal and, in the proxies’ discretion, “FOR” or “AGAINST” any other business that may properly come before the Meeting.
Quorum, Voting and Adjournment
For each Trust or Fund, the presence at the Meeting, in person or by proxy, of one-third of the outstanding shares of such Trust or Fund entitled to vote, as of the Record Date, shall be necessary and sufficient to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business for that Trust or Fund.
In the event that a quorum is not present at the Meeting, or if there are insufficient votes to approve a Proposal by the time of the Meeting, the proxies, or their substitutes, or the chairman of the Meeting may propose that the Meeting be adjourned one or more times to permit further solicitation. Any adjournment by the shareholders requires theJuly 22, 2020
4311
affirmative vote of a majority of the total number of shares that are present in person or by proxy when the adjournment is being voted on. If a quorum is present, the proxies will vote in favor of any such adjournment all shares that they are entitled to vote in favor of the Proposals and the proxies will vote against any such adjournment any shares for which they are directed to vote against the Proposals. The proxies will not vote any shares for which they are directed to abstain from voting on the Proposals.
Effect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes.For purposes of determining the presence of a quorum for transacting business at the Meeting, abstentions and broker “non-votes” (i.e., shares held by brokers or nominees, typically in “street name,” as to which (i) instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote and (ii) the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power on a particular matter) will be treated as shares that are present for purposes of determining a quorum. For purposes of determining the approval of the Proposals, abstentions and broker non-votes do not count as votes cast with respect to a Proposal. Accordingly, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on Proposal 1 and will have the effect of a vote against Proposal 2 and Proposal 3.
InvestEd Funds and Class E Shares of Ivy Funds. The InvestEd Plan (“InvestEd Plan”) was established under the Arizona Family College Savings Program (the “Program”). The Program was established by the State of Arizona as a qualified state tuition program in accordance with Section 529 of the Revenue Code. Contributions to the InvestEd Plan accounts may be invested in shares of the Funds, which are held in the name and for the benefit of the Arizona Commission for Postsecondary Education (“ACPE”) in its capacity as Trustee of the Program. The ACPE is responsible for casting votes for the beneficial owners of InvestEd Plan accounts (“Accountholders”). The ACPE will consider input from Accountholders in voting proxies but is not required to vote based on input from Accountholders. In voting proxies on routine items, such as the uncontested election of directors, the ACPE generally will vote for such proposals. If you want to provide your input to the ACPE, please visitwww.az529.gov.
Discretionary Voting
Broker-dealers that hold a Trust’s shares in “street name” for the benefit of their customers will request the instructions of such customers on how to vote their shares on the election of a Trustee. The Trusts understand that, under the rules of the NYSE, such broker-dealer firms may for
44
certain “routine” matters, without instructions from their customers and clients, grant discretionary authority to the proxies designated by the Board to vote if no instructions have been received prior to the date specified in the broker-dealer firm’s request for voting instructions. The election of a Trustee is a “routine” matter and beneficial owners who do not provide proxy instructions or who do not return a proxy card may have their shares voted by broker-dealer firms in favor of Proposal 1. Broker-dealers who are not members of the NYSE may be subject to other rules, which may or may not permit them to vote your shares without instruction. We urge you to provide instructions to your broker or nominee so that your votes may be counted.
Solicitation of Proxies
The initial solicitation of proxies will be made by mail. Additional solicitations may be made by telephone, e-mail, or other personal contact by the Trusts’ officers or employees or representatives of IICO or one of its affiliates or by a proxy soliciting firm retained by the Funds. IICO has retained Mediant Communications as proxy solicitor to assist in the solicitation of proxy votes primarily by contacting shareholders by telephone and facsimile. The proxy solicitor’s services include proxy consulting, mailing, tabulation and solicitation services. The cost of retaining such proxy solicitor, including printing and mailing costs, is estimated to be approximately $700,000,to be split evenly among the Funds. Costs will vary depending on the number of solicitations made. The Trusts’ officers, and those employees and representatives of IICO or its affiliates who assist in the proxy solicitation, will not receive any additional or special compensation for any such efforts. In addition, the Trusts will request broker-dealer firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners of their shares held of record by such persons.
45
Internet Availability of Proxy
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
JOINT SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON
APRIL 26, 2019
The Joint Proxy Statement and other proxy materials are available at www.proxypush.com/ivy.
OTHER INFORMATION
Share and Class Information
As of the Record Date, certain Trusts offered multiple classes of shares to the public pursuant to a Multiple Class Plan adopted by its respective Board (the “18f-3 Plan”). Each 18f-3 Plan sets forth that shares of each class of a Fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the Fund and generally have identical voting, dividend, liquidation, and other rights, preferences, powers, restrictions, limitations, qualifications, terms and conditions, except that each class bears certain class-specific expenses and has separate voting rights on certain matters that relate solely to that class or in which the interests of shareholders of one class differ from the interests of shareholders of another class.
Service Providers
Adviser. IICO, located at 6300 Lamar Avenue, P. O. Box 29217, Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66201, serves as the investment adviser to the Trusts. IICO is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc., located at 6300 Lamar Avenue, P.O. Box 29217, Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66201-9217.
Underwriter. IDI, located at 6300 Lamar Avenue, P. O. Box 29217, Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66201, serves as the underwriter for Ivy Funds and Ivy VIP. ALPS Distributors, Inc., located at 290 Broadway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80203, serves as the underwriter for NextShares. WRI, located at 6300 Lamar Avenue, Overland Park, Kansas, serves as the underwriter for InvestEd.
Custodian. The Bank of New York Mellon, located at One Wall Street, New York, New York 10286, serves as the custodian for Ivy Funds, InvestEd and Ivy VIP. State Street Bank and Trust Company, located at One Lincoln Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, serves as the custodian for NextShares.
46
Shareholder Servicing Agent. WI Services Company, 6300 Lamar Avenue, P. O. Box 29217, Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66201, serves as the shareholder servicing agent for the Ivy Funds, InvestEd and Ivy VIP.
Accounting Services Agent. WI Services Company, 6300 Lamar Avenue, P. O. Box 29217, Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66201, serves as the accounting services agent for the Trusts.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte & Touche”) was selected as the Trusts’ independent registered public accounting firm to audit the accounts of the Trusts. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche are not expected to attend the Meeting. The Trusts do not know of any direct or indirect financial interest of Deloitte & Touche in the Trusts.
The following tables shows the fees billed by Deloitte & Touche for audit and other services provided to the Trusts for the Trusts and fiscal years as indicated:
Ivy Funds*
March 31, 2018 | March 31, 2017 | |||||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 563,600 | $ | 568,000 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Tax Fees(3) | 107,805 | 229,548 | ||||||
All Other Fees(4) | 38,554 | 24,045 | ||||||
Total | $ | 709,959 | $ | 821,593 |
Ivy Funds**
June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 | |||||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 34,350 | $ | 38,100 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 2,667 | 4,000 | ||||||
Tax Fees(3) | 27,610 | 51,187 | ||||||
All Other Fees(4) | 2,330 | 4,703 | ||||||
Total | $ | 66,957 | $ | 97,990 |
Ivy Funds***
September 30, 2018 | September 30, 2017 | |||||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 401,700 | $ | 339,700 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Tax Fees(3) | 60,915 | 17,300 | ||||||
All Other Fees(4) | 550 | 325 | ||||||
Total | $ | 463,165 | $ | 357,325 |
47
Ivy NextShares
June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 | |||||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 61,800 | $ | 62,400 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 0 | 4,000 | ||||||
Tax Fees(3) | 13,365 | 0 | ||||||
All Other Fees(4) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Total | $ | 75,165 | $ | 66,400 |
Ivy VIP
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 381,000 | $ | 384,200 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Tax Fees(3) | 144,820 | 193,463 | ||||||
All Other Fees(4) | 19,386 | 30,524 | ||||||
Total | $ | 545,206 | $ | 608,187 |
InvestEd
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 56,700 | $ | 23,700 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Tax Fees(3) | 10,530 | 9,750 | ||||||
All Other Fees(4) | 5,161 | 158 | ||||||
Total | $ | 72,391 | $ | 33,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Trusts’ Audit Committee pre-approves all audit services to be provided by the Trusts’ independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee pre-approves all non-audit services to be performed for the Trusts by the Trusts’ independent registered accounting firm; provided that the pre-approval requirement does not apply to non-audit services that (i) were not identified as such at the time of the pre-approval and (ii) do not aggregate more than 5% of total fees paid to the principal accountants by each Trust during the fiscal year in which the services are provided, if the Audit Committee approves the provision of such non-audit services prior to the completion of the audit.
The Audit Committee pre-approves all non-audit services to be performed by the Trusts’ independent registered accounting firm for IICO, the Trusts’ investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted and overseen by IICO) or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with IICO that provides ongoing services to the Trusts if the engagement relates directly to the operations or financial reporting of the Trusts; provided that the pre-approval requirement does not apply to non-audit services that (i) were not identified as such at the time of the pre-approval and (ii) do not aggregate more than 5% of total fees paid to the independent registered accounting firm by the Trusts for all services and by IICO for non-audit services if the engagement relates directly to the operations or financial reporting of the Trusts during the fiscal year in which those services are provided, if the Audit Committee approves the provision of such non-audit services prior to the completion of the audits.
No services performed by Deloitte & Touche in the “audit-related fees,” “tax fees” or “all other fees” categories for the fiscal years indicated were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the pre-approval exceptions described above or the waiver provisions of paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC.
The aggregate non-audit fees billed for services rendered by Deloitte & Touche to each Trust for each of its past two fiscal years, respectively, were as follows:
2018 fiscal year | 2017 fiscal year | |||||||
Ivy Funds (3/31 fiscal year end) | $ | 146,359 | $ | 253,593 | ||||
Ivy Funds (6/30 fiscal year end) | $ | 32,607 | $ | 59,890 | ||||
Ivy Funds (9/30 fiscal year end) | $ | 61,465 | $ | 17,625 | ||||
Ivy NextShares (6/30 fiscal year end) | $ | 13,365 | $ | 4,000 |
49
2017 fiscal year | 2016 fiscal year | |||||||
Ivy VIP (12/31 fiscal year end) | $ | 164,206 | $ | 223,987 | ||||
InvestEd (12/31 fiscal year end) | $ | 15,691 | $ | 9,908 |
The aggregate non-audit fees billed for services rendered by Deloitte & Touche to IICO (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser) and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with IICO that provides ongoing services to each Trust for each of its past two fiscal years, respectively, were as follows:
2018 fiscal year | 2017 fiscal year | |||||||
Ivy Funds (3/31 fiscal year end) | $ | 57,100 | $ | 194,450 | ||||
Ivy Funds (6/30 fiscal year end) | $ | 97,700 | $ | 150,550 | ||||
Ivy Funds (9/30 fiscal year end) | $ | 116,700 | $ | 137,000 | ||||
Ivy NextShares (6/30 fiscal year end) | $ | 97,700 | $ | 150,550 |
2017 fiscal year | 2016 fiscal year | |||||||
Ivy VIP (12/31 fiscal year end) | $ | 122,000 | $ | 152,450 | ||||
InvestEd (12/31 fiscal year end) | $ | 122,000 | $ | 152,450 |
Shareholder Reports
Copies of each Trust’s Annual Report for the most recently completed fiscal year previously have been mailed to shareholders. This Joint Proxy Statement should be read in conjunction with each Annual Report. You can obtain copies of the Annual Reports, without charge, by writing to the respective Trust or to IDI at 6300 Lamar Avenue, P. O. Box 29217, Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66201, or by calling 800-777-6472. You should receive the reports within three business days of your request. Copies of these reports are also available free of charge at www.ivyinvestments.com.
Householding
To avoid sending duplicate copies of materials to households, the Trusts may mail only one copy of this Joint Proxy Statement to shareholders having the same last name and address on the Trusts’ records, unless a Trust has received contrary instructions from a shareholder. The consolidation of these mailings benefits the Trusts through reduced mailing expenses. If a shareholder wants to receive multiple copies of these materials, the shareholder should make a request by writing to that Trust’s underwriter at their address set forth above.
50
APPENDIX A
SHARES ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING
On the Record Date, each Fund had the following number of shares of each class issued and outstanding:
InvestEd Portfolios
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
Ivy Funds
Class A | Class B | Class C | Class E | |||||||||||||
Ivy Accumulative Fund | 112,297,857.642 | 133,405.476 | 358,503.561 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy Apollo Multi-Asset Income Fund | 11,809,119.718 | N/A | 1,484,906.804 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy Apollo Strategic Income Fund | 11,920,548.555 | N/A | 599,834.777 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy Asset Strategy Fund | 66,349,639.448 | 2,848,360.053 | 36,429,199.349 | 1,827,968.912 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Balanced Fund | 54,821,131.838 | 1,938,523.632 | 16,647,840.801 | 9,188.925 | ||||||||||||
Ivy California Municipal High Income Fund | 1,280,801.562 | N/A | 176,503.678 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy Cash Management Fund | 1,100,272,483.014 | 637,714.081 | 1,555,814.354 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy Core Equity Fund | 219,654,805.520 | 768,895.623 | 4,859,657.093 | 1,031,012.869 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Corporate Bond Fund | 57,065,278.091 | 108,010.078 | 630,447.546 | 39,808.917 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Crossover Credit Fund | 1,171,809.127 | N/A | N/A | 50,000.000 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 18,075,124.440 | 154,721.272 | 4,482,520.634 | 15,451.623 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Energy Fund | 14,786,832.618 | 148,132.769 | 3,329,233.713 | 10,279.390 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Global Bond Fund | 2,326,919.220 | 139,732.711 | 962,062.477 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy Global Equity Income Fund | 33,399,223.842 | 414,688.076 | 2,048,807.203 | 458,210.629 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Global Growth Fund | 11,240,086.410 | 27,993.425 | 253,593.787 | 3,798.665 |
A-1
Class A | Class B | Class C | Class E | |||||||||||||
Ivy Government Money Market Fund | 119,691,432.924 | 1,402,855.089 | 16,281,585.751 | 6,673,125.640 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Government Securities Fund | 12,995,141.063 | 54,550.524 | 201,630.098 | 46,040.516 | ||||||||||||
Ivy High Income Fund | 272,645,709.633 | 6,062,404.996 | 96,728,836.077 | 1,254,225.319 | ||||||||||||
Ivy IG International Small Cap Fund | 1,441,523.842 | N/A | 163,158.062 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy International Core Equity Fund | 34,519,945.806 | 282,305.826 | 11,706,174.393 | 444,490.392 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund | 94,734,804.051 | 610,653.043 | 5,045,872.135 | 859,638.471 | ||||||||||||
Ivy LaSalle Global Real Estate Fund | 1,765,875.472 | 73,771.887 | 391,000.267 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy Limited-Term Bond Fund | 340,422.598 | 340,422.598 | 4,597,942.944 | 446,737.520 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Managed International Opportunities Fund | 67,081,964.465 | 38,684.090 | 247,751.717 | 49,481.368 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund | 67,081,964.465 | 885,483.867 | 10,159,015.434 | 495,846.730 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Mid Cap Income Opportunities Fund | 9,352,010.160 | N/A | 1,131,472.261 | 203,656.599 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Municipal Bond Fund | 41,184,848.474 | 107,562.024 | 1,713,193.637 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy Municipal High Income Fund | 133,295,178.685 | 1,267,539.768 | 22,254,285.933 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy Natural Resources Fund | 16,704,710.445 | 156,115.596 | 2,103,646.980 | 287,396.753 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Pictet Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt Fund | 1,325,613.566 | N/A | 232,707.531 | 199,570.816 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Pictet Targeted Return Bond Fund | 2,170,478.535 | N/A | 409,783.721 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy PineBridge High Yield Fund | 809,070.164 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy ProShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Index Fund | 315,705.170 | N/A | N/A | 111,992.020 | ||||||||||||
Ivy ProShares MSCI ACWI Index Fund | 1,258,832.967 | N/A | N/A | 118,896.433 | ||||||||||||
Ivy ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers Index Fund | 210,512.378 | N/A | N/A | 92,661.514 |
A-2
Class A | Class B | Class C | Class E | |||||||||||||
Ivy ProShares S&P 500 Bond Index Fund | 303,236.352 | N/A | N/A | 123,418.152 | ||||||||||||
Ivy ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index Fund | 176,450.423 | N/A | N/A | 153,563.963 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Pzena International Value Fund | 5,174,720.668 | 23,609.343 | 152,922.473 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Ivy Science and Technology Fund | 62,103,862.507 | 763,473.696 | 10,304,354.342 | 562,364.013 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Securian Core Bond Fund | 16,490,464.798 | 198,604.605 | 1,233,439.801 | 328,804.687 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Securian Real Estate Securities Fund | 7,272,497.532 | 71,231.556 | 253,153.407 | 139,589.718 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Small Cap Core Fund | 10,491,362.255 | 152,411.328 | 2,505,689.758 | 11,792.845 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund | 64,875,189.088 | 684,843.620 | 7,102,967.671 | 623,574.511 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Value Fund | 15,815,676.396 | 87,430.539 | 742,675.710 | 8,419.780 | ||||||||||||
Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund | 110,004,698.955 | 608,845.680 | 1,579,687.154 | N/A |
Fund | Shares | |||||||||||||||||||
Class I | Class N | Class R | Class T | Class Y | ||||||||||||||||
Ivy Accumulative Fund | 24,892,388.130 | 24,295.432 | 24,295.432 | N/A | 24,295.432 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Apollo Multi-Asset Income Fund | 30,825,865.303 | 346,660.045 | N/A | N/A | 541,294.882 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Apollo Strategic Income Fund | 31,591,434.464 | 4,824,639.602 | N/A | N/A | 702,367.627 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Asset Strategy Fund | 40,339,156.741 | 168,969.088 | 2,290,421.984 | N/A | 7,560,949.964 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Balanced Fund | 38,244,775.501 | 545,784.577 | 565,850.466 | N/A | 1,051,361.563 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy California Municipal High Income Fund | 1,194,797.830 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 125,875.586 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Cash Management Fund | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Core Equity Fund | 73,987,186.592 | 3,324,013.561 | 59,172.214 | N/A | 3,246,958.806 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Corporate Bond Fund | 85,640,766.629 | 5,915,435.851 | 39,808.917 | N/A | 39,808.917 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Crossover Credit Fund | 2,148,356.196 | 50,000.000 | 50,000.000 | N/A | 100,000.339 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 61,907,187.223 | 15,467,061.858 | 827,596.069 | 13,927.577 | 2,283,734.419 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Energy Fund | 16,752,808.531 | 478,299.317 | 1,996,106.734 | N/A | 2,326,919.220 |
A-3
Fund | Shares | |||||||||||||||||||
Class I | Class N | Class R | Class T | Class Y | ||||||||||||||||
Ivy Global Bond Fund | 24,981,966.720 | 667,426.710 | 73,800.348 | N/A | 127,115.979 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Global Equity Income Fund | 33,607,146.961 | 1,870,621.540 | 57,736.881 | N/A | 642,068.537 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Global Growth Fund | 10,123,749.340 | 436,288.625 | 34,625.813 | N/A | 124,064.405 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Government Money Market Fund | N/A | 7,395,875.830 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Government Securities Fund | 23,274,810.758 | 33,070,529.861 | 46,040.516 | N/A | 46,040.516 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy High Income Fund | 280,913,425.257 | 9,093,340.379 | 8,774,453.124 | 36,720.670 | 35,498,130.351 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy IG International Small Cap Fund | 6,029,342.523 | 6,987,179.092 | N/A | N/A | 148,339.412 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy International Core Equity Fund | 194,926,077.992 | 84,349,284.891 | 6,289,676.726 | 13,185.654 | 22,220,422.747 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund | 83,322,595.677 | 4,493,179.601 | 815,327.271 | N/A | 1,686,017.888 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy LaSalle Global Real Estate Fund | 6,179,885.572 | 2,370,018.408 | 520,610.232 | N/A | 477,669.234 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Limited-Term Bond Fund | 64,472,042.940 | 15,848,180.143 | 42,451.557 | N/A | 809,133.005 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Managed International Opportunities Fund | 10,640,031.623 | 29,134.536 | 61,115.892 | N/A | 57,099.379 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund | 81,183,558.069 | 10,363,368.207 | 2,557,102.421 | N/A | 11,435,648.834 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Mid Cap Income Opportunities Fund | 26,110,297.829 | 4,028,637.385 | 231,087.718 | N/A | 921,742.342 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Municipal Bond Fund | 26,860,948.453 | 52,117.864 | N/A | N/A | 48,370.564 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Municipal High Income Fund | 82,287,032.909 | 164,336.774 | N/A | N/A | 1,371,469.365 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Natural Resources Fund | 7,996,072.229 | 362,272.485 | 1,160,010.325 | N/A | 1,392,818.061 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Pictet Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt Fund | 9,278,208.069 | 4,723,183.573 | 199,784.484 | N/A | 331,192.429 |
A-4
Fund | Shares | |||||||||||||||||||
Class I | Class N | Class R | Class T | Class Y | ||||||||||||||||
Ivy Pictet Targeted Return Bond Fund | 12,883,949.255 | 8,177,927.084 | N/A | N/A | 350,028.063 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy PineBridge High Yield Fund | 4,749,127.688 | 3,013,574.475 | 50,000.000 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Ivy ProShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Index Fund | 5,306,863.128 | 100,000.000 | 102,695.942 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Ivy ProShares MSCI ACWI Index Fund | 4,597,807.769 | 2,937,415.166 | 199,294.534 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Ivy ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers Index Fund | 9,177,140.353 | 3,028,812.239 | 80,000.000 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Ivy ProShares S&P 500 Bond Index Fund | 7,214,439.312 | 100,000.000 | 102,438.600 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Ivy ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index Fund | 24,822,397.947 | 7,239,371.739 | 80,000.000 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Pzena International Value Fund | 6,175,746.338 | 6,916,155.699 | 19,116.025 | N/A | 114,445.200 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Science and Technology Fund | 31,402,985.886 | 1,297,160.133 | 2,098,995.420 | N/A | 6,858,555.385 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Securian Core Bond Fund | 53,823,836.265 | 11,923,346.444 | 123,034.072 | N/A | 462,499.889 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Securian Real Estate Securities Fund | 7,184,911.142 | 24,716.171 | 31,925.155 | N/A | 3,918,642.268 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Small Cap Core Fund | 21,178,098.273 | 3,994,108.175 | 933,191.173 | 13,912.076 | 952,382.252 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund | 43,341,073.291 | 6,682,383.335 | 3,976,535.459 | 13,728.720 | 6,639,896.672 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Value Fund | 26,067,281.862 | 6,254,900.387 | 14,408.945 | N/A | 18,793.204 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund | 58,173,608.263 | 28,669.725 | 28,669.725 | N/A | 28,669.725 |
Ivy NextShares
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
A-5
Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios
Fund | Shares | |||||||
Class I | Class II | |||||||
Ivy VIP Asset Strategy | 32,573.546 | 89,494,258.152 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Balanced | N/A | 41,219,824.369 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Core Equity | N/A | 58,128,498.552 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Corporate Bond | N/A | 103,278,038.645 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Energy | 51,152.222 | 10,536,986.126 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Global Bond | N/A | 4,527,267.976 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Global Equity Income | N/A | 41,138,009.488 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Global Growth | N/A | 15,439,702.440 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Government Money Market | N/A | 238,622,880.190 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Growth | N/A | 60,020,481.064 | ||||||
Ivy VIP High Income | 13,046,011.986 | 240,888,777.052 | ||||||
Ivy VIP International Core Equity | N/A | 46,046,741.768 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Limited-Term Bond | N/A | 109,949,724.102 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Mid Cap Growth | 16,364,711.370 | 20,873,734.321 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Natural Resources | N/A | 25,031,643.128 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Aggressive | N/A | 12,760,057.046 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Conservative | N/A | 19,702,082.799 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderate | N/A | 141,922,376.714 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderate – Managed Volatility | N/A | 113,680,766.040 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderately Aggressive | N/A | 166,206,273.247 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderately Aggressive – Managed Volatility | N/A | 16,182,296.864 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderately Conservative | N/A | 41,645,052.285 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderately Conservative – Managed Volatility | N/A | 14,087,562.827 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Science and Technology | 25,300.032 | 19,509,171.560 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Securian Real Estate Securities | N/A | 5,100,138.340 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Small Cap Core | N/A | 13,004,814.514 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Small Cap Growth | 6,699,245.631 | 38,797,020.951 | ||||||
Ivy VIP Value | N/A | 78,842,302.125 |
A-6
APPENDIX B
INFORMATION ON NUMBER OF BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS
During the most recent full fiscal year for each Fund listed in the table below, the Board and each standing Committee of the Trusts met the following number of times:
Trust | 2018 Fiscal Year End | # of Governance Committee Meetings | # of Audit Committee Meetings | # of Investment Oversight Committee Meetings | # of Executive Committee Meetings | |||||||||||||||
Ivy Funds | 3/31 | * | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Ivy Funds | 6/30 | ** | 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Ivy Funds | 9/30 | *** | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Ivy NextShares | 6/30 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
InvestEd Portfolios | 12/31 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Ivy VIP | 12/31 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
|
Ivy Asset Strategy Fund
Ivy Balanced Fund
Ivy Core Equity Fund
Ivy Emerging Markets Equity Fund
Ivy Energy Fund
Ivy Global Bond Fund
Ivy Global Equity Income Fund
Ivy Global Growth Fund
Ivy Government Money Market Fund
Ivy High Income Fund
Ivy International Core Equity Fund
Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund
Ivy LaSalle Global Real Estate Fund
Ivy Limited-Term Bond Fund
Ivy Managed International Opportunities Fund
Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund
Ivy Mid Cap Income Opportunities Fund
Ivy Municipal Bond Fund
Ivy Municipal High Income Fund
Ivy Natural Resources Fund
Ivy Pzena International Value Fund
Ivy Science and Technology Fund
Ivy Securian Core Bond Fund
Ivy Securian Real Estate Securities Fund
Ivy Small Cap Core Fund
Ivy Small Cap Growth Fund
Ivy Value Fund
|
Ivy Accumulative Fund
Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund
|
Ivy Apollo Multi-Asset Income Fund
Ivy Apollo Strategic Income Fund
Ivy California Municipal High Income Fund
Ivy Cash Management Fund
Ivy Corporate Bond Fund
Ivy Crossover Credit Fund
Ivy Government Securities Fund
B-1
Ivy IG International Small Cap Fund
Ivy Pictet Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt Fund
Ivy Pictet Targeted Return Bond Fund
Ivy PineBridge High Yield Fund
Ivy ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index Fund
Ivy ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers Index Fund
Ivy ProShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Index Fund
Ivy ProShares S&P 500 Bond Index Fund
Ivy ProShares MSCI ACWI Index Fund
B-2
APPENDIX C
GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER
InvestEd Portfolios
Ivy Funds
Ivy High Income Opportunities Fund
Ivy NextShares
Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios
Waddell & Reed Advisors Funds
|
The Governance Committee (the “Committee”) is a committee of the Boards of Trustees (collectively, the “Board”) of InvestEd Portfolios, Ivy Funds, Ivy High Income Opportunities Fund, Ivy NextShares, Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios and Waddell & Reed Advisors Funds (each a “Trust” and collectively, the “Trusts”).
The purpose of the Committee is to assist the Board or, as applicable, the Board members who are not “interested persons” of the Trusts, as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) (the “Independent Trustees”), with respect to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
A successful candidate must qualify as an Independent Trustee under the 1940 Act and should have certain characteristics, such as a high level of integrity, appropriate experience, and a commitment to fulfill the fiduciary duties inherent in Board membership. The Committee also shall consider the extent to which potential candidates possess sufficiently diverse skill sets that would contribute to the Board’s overall effectiveness.
C-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C-5
|
|
|
C-6
APPENDIX D
FUND SHARES OWNED BY TRUSTEES AND TRUSTEE NOMINEES
The following table shows the amount of securities owned by the Current Trustees and Trustee nominees in the Funds that they are nominated to oversee as of the end of each Fund’s respective fiscal year. If a Fund is not listed next to a Trustee, such Trustee does not own any shares of such Fund.
|
|
|
| |||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
D-1
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
D-2
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| ||||||
|
|
D-3
Note 1: Dollar range of shares of the following Portfolios “owned” through deemed investments by Joseph Harroz, Jr.:
|
Note 2: Dollar range of shares of the following Portfolio “owned” through deemed investments by Frank J. Ross, Jr.:
|
Note 3: Dollar range of shares of the following Portfolios “owned” through deemed investments by Michael G. Smith:
| ||||
|
D-4
APPENDIX E
OWNERSHIP OF SHARES
Occasionally, the number of shares of the Funds held in “street name” accounts of various securities dealers for the benefit of their clients as well as the number of shares held by other shareholders of record may exceed 5% of the total shares outstanding. As of January 30, 2019, to the best of the knowledge of the Funds, the following shareholders owned of record or beneficially 5% or more of any class of the outstanding voting shares of each Fund:
Ivy NextShares
Fund Name | Shareholder Name, City and State | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | |||||||
Ivy Focused Energy NextShares | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 425,431 | 94.54 | % | ||||||
Ivy Focused Growth NextShares | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 429,642 | 99.91 | % | ||||||
Ivy Focused Value NextShares | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 424,907 | 94.42 | % |
Ivy Funds
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
Ivy Accumulative Fund | C | Tammy Nunn Nashville, TN | 20,636.417 | 5.76 | % | |||||||
N | Ivy Investment Management Company Mission, KS | 24,295.432 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
R | Ivy Investment Management Company Mission, KS | 24,295.432 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Mission, KS | 24,295.432 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Apollo Multi-Asset Income Fund | C | National Financial Services Corporation Jersey City, NJ | 180,727.755 | 12.16 | % | |||||||
C | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 124,065.598 | 8.35 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James St. Petersburg, FL | 83,465.984 | 5.62 | % |
E-1
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 129,117.627 | 8.69 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 76,230.114 | 5.13 | % | ||||||||
C | Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. St. Louis, MO | 78,207.480 | 5.26 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 144,515.985 | 41.76 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 201,520.914 | 58.24 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 43,871.674 | 8.10 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Jersey City, NJ | 180,582.607 | 33.36 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 303,476.671 | 56.06 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Apollo Strategic Income Fund | A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 2,808,406.648 | 23.50 | % | |||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Jersey City, NJ | 32,270.528 | 5.38 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 40,402.012 | 6.73 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 49,840.150 | 8.31 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 4,694,082.836 | 97.19 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 329,769.050 | 46.95 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 300,000.000 | 42.71 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Asset Strategy Fund | A | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 6,997,108.511 | 10.54 | % | |||||||
A | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC New York, NY | 5,601,925.683 | 8.44 | % |
E-2
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
A | National Financial Services Corp. Jersey City, NJ | 4,601,008.005 | 6.93 | % | ||||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 996,799.133 | 34.96 | % | ||||||||
B | National Financial Services Corp. Jersey City, NJ | 271,208.163 | 9.51 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 5,801,320.674 | 15.90 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 2,415,735.545 | 6.62 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 4,175,030.980 | 11.44 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC New York, NY | 4,393,995.166 | 12.04 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corp. Jersey City, NJ | 2,775,557.090 | 7.61 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 2,727,798.898 | 7.48 | % | ||||||||
C | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 2,384,678.317 | 6.54 | % | ||||||||
I | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 2,655,035.489 | 6.57 | % | ||||||||
I | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 2,764,397.177 | 6.84 | % | ||||||||
N | Mid Atlantic Trust Pittsburgh, PA | 15,165.682 | 8.96 | % | ||||||||
N | State Street Bank and Trust Boston, MA | 13,082.521 | 7.73 | % | ||||||||
N | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 48,438.729 | 28.61 | % | ||||||||
N | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 37,089.516 | 21.90 | % | ||||||||
N | DCGT Trustee Des Moines, IA | 9,269.310 | 5.47 | % | ||||||||
N | Nationwide Investment Services Corp. Columbus, OH | 18,577.665 | 10.97 | % |
E-3
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
Y | Voya Institutional Trust Company Windsor, CT | 3,093,006.674 | 40.89 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 548,813.980 | 7.25 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 390,694.888 | 5.16 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corp. Jersey City, NJ | 567,565.433 | 7.50 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corp. Columbus, OH | 992,422.754 | 13.12 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Balanced Fund | A | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 3,399,440.508 | 6.20 | % | |||||||
B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 168,166.187 | 8.66 | % | ||||||||
B | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 151,325.371 | 7.80 | % | ||||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 482,950.356 | 24.88 | % | ||||||||
B | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 329,424.281 | 16.97 | % | ||||||||
B | American Enterprise Investment Svc Minneapolis, MN | 113,311.925 | 5.84 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corp. Boston, MA | 1.292,780.467 | 7.76 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 1,157,596.796 | 6.95 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 1,804,042.150 | 10.83 | |||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 1,671,449.840 | 10.03 | % | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Svc Minneapolis, MN | 1,635,751.517 | 9.82 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 1,496,466.645 | 8.98 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 1,252,360.612 | 7.52 | % |
E-4
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
E | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 9,188.925 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 210,704.742 | 38.62 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corp. Boston, MA | 105,370.384 | 9.96 | % | ||||||||
Y | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 58,101.352 | 5.49 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 99,220.508 | 9.38 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 131,611.778 | 12.44 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corp. Columbus, OH | 327,109.802 | 30.93 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 97,043.535 | 9.17 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 60,045.088 | 5.68 | % | ||||||||
Ivy California Municipal High Income Fund | A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 500,000.000 | 39.04 | % | |||||||
C | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 100,000.000 | 56.66 | % | ||||||||
C | Katie Ann Boyle & Karen A Boyle Napa, CA | 10,410.751 | 5.90 | % | ||||||||
C | Kelly Boyle & Karen A Boyle Poway, CA | 10,409.710 | 5.90 | % | ||||||||
C | Michelle Silva San Jose, CA | 10,432.956 | 5.91 | % | ||||||||
I | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 300,000.000 | 25.11 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 22,624.747 | 17.97 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 100,000.000 | 79.44 | % |
E-5
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
Ivy Cash Management Fund | A | Pershing LLC Jersey City, NJ | 455,231,808.820 | 41.24 | % | |||||||
B | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 240,000.000 | 37.63 | % | ||||||||
B | Cynthia A. Covert Columbiana, OH | 45,342.800 | 7.11 | % | ||||||||
B | Alice J. Morris Lakeville, MN | 68,048.503 | 10.67 | % | ||||||||
B | Stanka Consulting Sacramento, CA | 65,293.407 | 10.34 | % | ||||||||
B | DeannaDix-Brown Pratt, KS | 48,278.500 | 7.57 | % | ||||||||
C | Rose M. McElderry Wichita, KS | 83,843.230 | 5.39 | % | ||||||||
C | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 248,247.310 | 15.96 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Core Equity | B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 86,331.305 | 11.22 | % | |||||||
B | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 49,551.090 | 6.44 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corp. Boston, MA | 267,376.131 | 5.49 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 253,332.337 | 5.20 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 245,183.709 | 5.03 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 386,361.154 | 7.93 | % | ||||||||
N | Bank of New York-Mellon Shawnee Mission, KS | 2,621,788.038 | 78.80 | % | ||||||||
N | Waddell & Reed InvestEd Growth Portfolio Shawnee Mission, KS | 281,751.322 | 8.47 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corp. Boston, MA | 627,146.272 | 19.30 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 321,487.227 | 9.89 | % |
E-6
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Trust Company Columbus, OH | 374,572.649 | 11.53 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 742,673.128 | 22.85 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Corporate Bond Fund | B | Steven Johnson Great Falls, MT | 5,776.592 | 5.35 | % | |||||||
E | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 39,808.917 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
R | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 39,808.917 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 5,560,701.934 | 93.91 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 39,808.917 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Crossover Credit Fund | A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 1,000,000.000 | 85.34 | % | |||||||
E | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 50,000.000 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
I | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 142,153.123 | 6.62 | % | ||||||||
I | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 1,250,000.000 | 58.18 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 50,000.000 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
R | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 50,000.000 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 100,000.000 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Emerging Markets Equity | A | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 1,498,687.554 | 8.31 | % | |||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 14,262.144 | 9.22 | % |
E-7
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
B | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 9,192.067 | 5.94 | % | ||||||||
B | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 13,294.851 | 8.59 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 233,058.116 | 5.20 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 964,650.267 | 21.51 | % | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 643,245.449 | 14.35 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 602,861.842 | 13.44 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 320,363.457 | 7.17 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 350,175.864 | 7.81 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 261,724.472 | 5.84 | % | ||||||||
E | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 7,206.215 | 46.64 | % | ||||||||
E | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 8,245.408 | 53.36 | % | ||||||||
I | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 5,139,182.865 | 8.30 | % | ||||||||
I | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 8,183,535.596 | 8.37 | % | ||||||||
I | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 5,380,831.026 | 8.69 | % | ||||||||
I | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 7,141,992.056 | 11.53 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 2,520,553.722 | 16.29 | % | ||||||||
N | Bank of New York-Mellon Shawnee Mission, KS | 7,274,466.116 | 47.01 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 1,409,707.581 | 9.11 | % |
E-8
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
T | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 13,927.577 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 217,694.893 | 9.58 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 1,306,452.106 | 57.51 | % | ||||||||
Y | Minnesota Life Insurance Company St. Paul, MN | 139,465.535 | 6.14 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 139,749.732 | 6.15 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 127,203.216 | 5.60 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Energy | B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 24,042.472 | 16.23 | % | |||||||
B | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 46,731.930 | 31.55 | % | ||||||||
B | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 21,820.447 | 14.73 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 277,905.256 | 8.32 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 302,016.458 | 9.04 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 242,212.054 | 7.25 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 209,887.190 | 6.28 | % | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 321,208.043 | 9.61 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 319,311.170 | 9.56 | % | ||||||||
C | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 225,158.148 | 6.74 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 305,643.145 | 9.15 | % |
E-9
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
E | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 10,279.390 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
I | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 1,270,684.469 | 7.58 | % | ||||||||
I | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 865,768.765 | 5.16 | % | ||||||||
I | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 1,068,277.912 | 6.37 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 121,427.475 | �� | 5.21 | % | |||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 214,279.670 | 9.20 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 702,776.963 | 30.16 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Global Bond | B | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 18,283.936 | 13.08 | % | |||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 9,652.990 | 6.91 | % | ||||||||
B | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 16,720.183 | 11.97 | % | ||||||||
B | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 8,108.340 | 5.80 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 172,509.902 | 17.93 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 97,356.877 | 10.12 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 53,921.850 | 5.60 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 58,217.127 | 6.05 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 38,122.106 | 5.71 | % | ||||||||
N | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 192,748.133 | 28.87 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 19,348.017 | 15.22 | % |
E-10
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 29,180.867 | 22.96 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 42,193.855 | 33.20 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 14,338.417 | 11.28 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Global Equity Income | B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 50,662.869 | 12.21 | % | |||||||
B | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 33,352.131 | 8.04 | % | ||||||||
B | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 102,777.779 | 24.78 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 323,030.189 | 15.75 | % | ||||||||
C | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 152,910.937 | 7.46 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 202,014.118 | 9.85 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 113,301.231 | 6.05 | % | ||||||||
N | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 200,804.521 | 10.72 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 44,459.328 | 6.92 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 315,912.410 | 49.21 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 236,794.826 | 36.88 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Global Growth | B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 5,394.034 | 19.27 | % | |||||||
B | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 3,281.664 | 11.72 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 13,892.732 | 5.48 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 13,162.808 | 5.19 | % |
E-11
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
C | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 19,161.233 | 7.56 | % | ||||||||
C | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 22,298.757 | 8.79 | % | ||||||||
E | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 3,798.665 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 15,179.938 | 11.69 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 49,058.686 | 37.78 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 23,802.260 | 18.33 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Government Money Market | A | Pershing LLC Jersey City, NJ | 16,556,574.990 | 13.78 | % | |||||||
B | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 140,171.470 | 9.99 | % | ||||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 244,248.995 | 17.41 | % | ||||||||
B | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 345,000.000 | 24.59 | % | ||||||||
B | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 131,131.850 | 9.35 | % | ||||||||
B | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 75,735.491 | 5.40 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 5,477,855.016 | 31.37 | % | ||||||||
C | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 1,224,298.000 | 7.01 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 1,588,520.236 | 9.10 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Government Securities Fund | B | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 3,469.511 | 6.36 | % | |||||||
B | Elaine C. Reilly West Warwick, RI | 3,020.360 | 5.54 | % | ||||||||
E | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 46,040.516 | 100.00 | % |
E-12
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 17,625,006.575 | 53.26 | % | ||||||||
N | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 2,716,097.605 | 8.21 | % | ||||||||
N | InvestEd Income Portfolio Shawnee Mission, KS | 2,631,509.230 | 7.95 | % | ||||||||
R | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 46,040.516 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 46,040.516 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Ivy High Income | N | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 1,766,511.001 | 19.39 | % | |||||||
N | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 757,001.574 | 8.31 | % | ||||||||
N | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 534,518.547 | 5.87 | % | ||||||||
Ivy IG International Small Cap | A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 830,956.241 | 57.62 | % | |||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 21,607.756 | 13.24 | % | ||||||||
C | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 100,000.001 | 61.29 | % | ||||||||
I | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 1,475,000.001 | 24.50 | % | ||||||||
I | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 746,227.370 | 12.40 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 5,223,902.492 | 74.67 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 45,032.052 | 30.36 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 100,070.782 | 67.47 | % |
E-13
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
Ivy International Core Equity | A | State Street Bank Trust Boston, MA | 3,059,899.427 | 8.86 | % | |||||||
A | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 1,973,380.230 | 5.71 | % | ||||||||
B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 29,868.427 | 10.57 | % | ||||||||
B | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 24,179.259 | 8.55 | % | ||||||||
B | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 15,647.677 | 5.54 | % | ||||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 57,236.178 | 20.25 | % | ||||||||
B | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 20,918.380 | 7.40 | % | ||||||||
B | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 21,539.892 | 7.62 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 816,463.476 | 6.97 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 658,621.703 | 5.62 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 1,139,141.198 | 9.72 | % | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 1,906,760.029 | 16.27 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 1,987,303.181 | 16.96 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 793,746.463 | 6.77 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 1,266,258.582 | 10.81 | % | ||||||||
I | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 36,379,436.870 | 18.66 | % | ||||||||
I | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 23,871,460.649 | 12.24 | % | ||||||||
I | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 12,194,425.656 | 6.25 | % |
E-14
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 11,307,682.968 | 13.45 | % | ||||||||
N | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 21,973,861.169 | 26.14 | % | ||||||||
T | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 13,185.654 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 7,323,512.124 | 32.95 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 2,273,342.575 | 10.23 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 3,212,569.929 | 14.46 | % | ||||||||
Ivy High Income Fund | B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 362,891.248 | 5.98 | % | |||||||
B | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 429,551.475 | 7.08 | % | ||||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 2,170,507.197 | 35.79 | % | ||||||||
B | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 421,512.302 | 6.95 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 7,087,724.571 | 7.34 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 7,033,031.283 | 7.28 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 15,533,180.767 | 16.08 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 6,214,021.296 | 6.43 | % | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 9,731,954.266 | 10.07 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 7,388,080.409 | 7.65 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 6,382,501.653 | 6.61 | % |
E-15
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
I | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 21,889,233.670 | 7.79 | % | ||||||||
I | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 18,459,845.724 | 6.57 | % | ||||||||
I | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 17,305,239.507 | 6.16 | % | ||||||||
I | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 19,298,411.365 | 6.87 | % | ||||||||
T | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 32,808.399 | 89.35 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 2,256,034.503 | 6.44 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 5,682,175.283 | 16.23 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 7,983.138 | 22.80 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 2,457,294.034 | 7.02 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Large Cap Growth | B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 33,043.363 | 5.41 | % | |||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 86,665.101 | 14.19 | % | ||||||||
B | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 72,581.651 | 11.89 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 361,282.181 | 7.16 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 326,414.285 | 6.47 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 535,658.510 | 10.61 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 426,836.842 | 8.45 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 477,861.654 | 9.46 | % | ||||||||
I | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 5,287,570.722 | 6.34 | % |
E-16
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 2,889,684.968 | 64.26 | % | ||||||||
N | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 458,182.705 | 10.19 | % | ||||||||
N | 264,634.839 | 5.89 | % | |||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 180,818.819 | 10.73 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 295,058.554 | 17.50 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 269,529.031 | 15.99 | % | ||||||||
Ivy LaSalle Global Real Estate | B | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 65,344.554 | 88.58 | % | |||||||
C | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 246,330.076 | 62.96 | % | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 23,002.670 | 5.88 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 1,953,972.182 | 82.37 | % | ||||||||
N | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 171,359.226 | 7.22 | % | ||||||||
Y | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 84,409.359 | 17.67 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 367,870.017 | 77.01 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Limited-Term Bond | A | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 2,216,026.296 | 6.20 | % | |||||||
B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 44,593.291 | 13.10 | % | ||||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 119,338.247 | 35.06 | % | ||||||||
B | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 32,174.478 | 9.45 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 485,201.104 | 10.49 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 568,162.106 | 12.29 | % |
E-17
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
C | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 813,564.953 | 17.60 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 332,048.543 | 7.18 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 58,912.924 | 7.26 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 130,294.839 | 16.06 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 82,794.426 | 10.20 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Managed International Opportunities | C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 25,193.393 | 10.17 | % | |||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 14,132.426 | 5.70 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 22,156.496 | 8.94 | % | ||||||||
E | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 49,481.368 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 6,753.157 | 23.81 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 22,381.379 | 76.82 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 12,442.338 | 21.79 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 38,207.090 | 66.91 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 3,238.425 | 5.67 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Mid Cap Growth | B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 53,371.418 | 5.98 | % | |||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 233,807.260 | 26.20 | % | ||||||||
B | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 47,564.280 | 5.33 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 901,632.229 | 8.88 | % |
E-18
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 568,827.224 | 5.60 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 707,818.015 | 6.97 | % | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 602,514.684 | 5.93 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 1,268,704.549 | 12.50 | % | ||||||||
C | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 523,059.031 | 5.15 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 1,586,159.971 | 15.62 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 677,249.608 | 6.67 | % | ||||||||
I | Stifel Nicolaus & Co., Inc. St. Louis, MO | 4,142,748.684 | 5.11 | % | ||||||||
I | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 6,708,662.351 | 8.28 | % | ||||||||
I | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 9,419,614.811 | 11.62 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 2,214,199.043 | 21.37 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 1,026.034 | 9.91 | % | ||||||||
N | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 1,142,806.490 | 11.03 | % | ||||||||
N | Voya Institutional Trust Company Braintree, MA | 671,652.597 | 6.42 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 2,647,133.028 | 23.18 | % | ||||||||
Y | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 695,824.218 | 6.09 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 684,137.795 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 1,459,580.847 | 12.78 | % |
E-19
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 571,973.214 | 7.64 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 1,221,525.106 | 10.07 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Mid Cap Income Opportunities | A | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 726,256.765 | 7.77 | % | |||||||
A | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 1,306,116.414 | 13.97 | % | ||||||||
A | Ameritrade, Inc. Omaha, NE | 548,842,326.000 | 5.87 | % | ||||||||
C | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 96,879.602 | 8.59 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 72,065.980 | 6.39 | % | ||||||||
C | Stifel Nicolaus & Co., Inc. St. Louis, MO | 56,893.154 | 5.04 | % | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 65,408.983 | 5.80 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 143,275.566 | 12.70 | % | ||||||||
C | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 156,763.810 | 13.89 | % | ||||||||
E | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 203,656.599 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
I | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 3,883,640.990 | 14.89 | % | ||||||||
I | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 1,621,200.582 | 6.21 | % | ||||||||
I | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 2,989,264.101 | 11.46 | % | ||||||||
I | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 1,621,384.373 | 6.22 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 853,125.583 | 21.18 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 1,904,522.222 | 47.29 | % |
E-20
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
N | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 470,103.918 | 11.67 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 167,701.935 | 18.24 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 305,330.152 | 33.20 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 46,212.224 | 5.03 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 296,144.386 | 32.20 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Municipal Bond | B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 10,781.065 | 10.02 | % | |||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 37,494.193 | 34.86 | % | ||||||||
B | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 13,461.770 | 12.52 | % | ||||||||
B | Henrietta G. Roskamp Edgerton, MN | 9,406.636 | 8.75 | % | ||||||||
B | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 5,951.518 | 5.53 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 156,906.585 | 9.14 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 97,823.358 | 5.70 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 31,109.461 | 59.69 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 21,008.403 | 40.31 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 5,972.950 | 12.35 | % | ||||||||
Y | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 36,182.573 | 74.80 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 4,860.507 | 10.05 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Municipal High Income | A | P. Daniel Orlich Vienna, VA | 10,468,452.397 | 7.85 | % | |||||||
B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 203,546.028 | 16.05 | % |
E-21
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 198,979.286 | 15.69 | % | ||||||||
B | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 390,220.723 | 30.77 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 3,185,173.496 | 14.32 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 3,450,819.716 | 15.51 | % | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 1,263,489.995 | 5.68 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 1,895,790.086 | 8.52 | % | ||||||||
C | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 2,384,069.767 | 10.72 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 133,299.619 | 5.99 | % | ||||||||
I | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 7,180,512.012 | 8.72 | % | ||||||||
I | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 5,213,417.353 | 6.33 | % | ||||||||
I | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 5,634,728.100 | 6.84 | % | ||||||||
I | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 4,866,490.432 | 5.91 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 100,936.801 | 61.42 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 48,923.679 | 29.77 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 83,752.381 | 6.10 | % | ||||||||
Y | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 1,010,221.161 | 73.57 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 88,666.636 | 6.46 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Natural Resources | A | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 966,752.093 | 5.78 | % |
E-22
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 26,244.168 | 16.80 | % | ||||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 17,699.574 | 11.34 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 142,425.323 | 6.76 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 147,441.048 | 7.00 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 225,948.238 | 10.73 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 246,213.430 | 11.69 | % | ||||||||
C | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 146,399.455 | 6.95 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 143,937.738 | 6.84 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 288,943.416 | 13.72 | % | ||||||||
I | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 570,134.096 | 7.13 | % | ||||||||
I | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 889,616.169 | 11.13 | % | ||||||||
I | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 757,040.778 | 9.47 | % | ||||||||
R | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 104,546.939 | 9.02 | % | ||||||||
Y | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 110,341.265 | 7.92 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 175,737.066 | 12.62 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 100,334.106 | 7.20 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Pictet Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt Fund | A | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 76,891.054 | 5.80 | % |
E-23
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 575,796.179 | 43.40 | % | ||||||||
C | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 199,565.690 | 85.76 | % | ||||||||
E | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 199,570.816 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
I | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 3,164,226.076 | 34.04 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 4,727,924.726 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 30,635.127 | 9.25 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 300,536.482 | 90.74 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Pictet Targeted Return Bond Fund | A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 800,000.000 | 36.73 | % | |||||||
A | David Funk & Shirlene Funk Hansen, ID | 135,115.337 | 6.20 | % | ||||||||
C | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 350,000.000 | 85.41 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 8,164,932.828 | 99.74 | % | ||||||||
Y | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 350,000.000 | 99.99 | % | ||||||||
Ivy PineBridge High Yield Fund | A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 550,544.017 | 68.02 | % | |||||||
I | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 1,201,186.945 | 25.27 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 2,746,559.534 | 91.05 | % | ||||||||
N | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | �� | 269,943.135 | 8.95 | % |
E-24
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
R | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 50,000.000 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Ivy ProShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Index Fund | A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 300,000.000 | 95.03 | % | |||||||
E | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 100,000.000 | 89.29 | % | ||||||||
I | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 400,000.000 | 7.52 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 100,000.000 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
R | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 100,000.000 | 97.37 | % | ||||||||
Ivy ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers Index Fund | A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 120,000.000 | 56.97 | % | |||||||
E | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 80,000.000 | 86.34 | % | ||||||||
R | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 80,000.000 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 2,486,163.474 | 82.01 | % | ||||||||
N | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 277,077.660 | 9.14 | % | ||||||||
Ivy ProShares S&P 500 Bond Index Fund | A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 300,000.000 | 98.39 | % | |||||||
E | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 100,000.000 | 81.62 | % | ||||||||
E | Kiran Kamity San Jose, CA | 13,234.692 | 10.80 | % | ||||||||
I | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 400,000.000 | 5.53 | % | ||||||||
R | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 100,000.000 | 97.62 | % |
E-25
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
N | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 100,000.000 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Ivy ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index Fund | A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 120,000.000 | 68.01 | % | |||||||
E | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 80,000.000 | 52.10 | % | ||||||||
R | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 80,000.000 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 5,205,889.060 | 71.85 | % | ||||||||
N | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 762,740.929 | 10.03 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy InvestEd Balanced Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 458,881.434 | 6.33 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy InvestEd Conservative Portfolio Shawnee Mission, KS | 382,407.082 | 5.28 | % | ||||||||
Ivy ProShares MSCI ACWI Index Fund | A | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 750,000.000 | 59.60 | % | |||||||
A | Douglas L. Baskins Loveland, CO | 79,079.244 | 6.28 | % | ||||||||
E | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 100,000.000 | 84.15 | % | ||||||||
I | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 1,050,000.000 | 22.83 | % | ||||||||
R | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 199,294.534 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
N | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 1,310,827.480 | 44.61 | % | ||||||||
N | InvestEd Balanced Portfolio Shawnee Mission, KS | 643,861.343 | 21.91 | % | ||||||||
N | InvestEd Conservative Portfolio Shawnee Mission, KS | 384,875.055 | 13.10 | % | ||||||||
N | InvestEd Aggressive Portfolio Shawnee Mission, KS | 294,343.906 | 10.02 | % |
E-26
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
N | InvestEd Income Portfolio Shawnee Mission, KS | 304,536.006 | 10.36 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Pzena International Value | B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 8,246.558 | 34.93 | % | |||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 9,289.363 | 6.05 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 8,222.443 | 5.36 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 52,426.552 | 34.17 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 4,156,163.145 | 60.02 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Managed International Opportunities Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 2,289,545.319 | 33.06 | % | ||||||||
N | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 472,562.071 | 6.82 | % | ||||||||
Y | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 55,718.752 | 48.70 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 25,162.128 | 21.99 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Science and Technology Fund | B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 106,786.373 | 13.98 | % | |||||||
B | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 102,769.290 | 13.45 | % | ||||||||
B | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 51,499.855 | 6.74 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 743,522.408 | 7.21 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 626,762.818 | 6.08 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 1,139,259.202 | 11.05 | % | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 771,568.689 | 7.48 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 1,180,299.903 | 11.45 | % |
E-27
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
C | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 794,395.342 | 7.70 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 871,454.966 | 8.45 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 1,002,225.739 | 9.72 | % | ||||||||
I | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 1,602,222.191 | 5.08 | % | ||||||||
I | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 1,583,808.279 | 5.03 | % | ||||||||
N | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 581,634.678 | 44.92 | % | ||||||||
N | Voya Institutional Trust Company Braintree, MA | 119,381.689 | 9.22 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 2,022,609.067 | 29.46 | % | ||||||||
Y | Voya Institutional Trust Company Braintree, MA | 351,080.491 | 5.11 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 531,559.721 | 7.74 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 877,882.491 | 12.79 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 412,284.781 | 6.01 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Securian Core Bond | A | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 1,493,590.518 | 8.99 | % | |||||||
B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 36,508.230 | 18.13 | % | ||||||||
B | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 13,476.251 | 6.69 | % | ||||||||
B | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 40,116.588 | 19.93 | % | ||||||||
B | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 17,098.912 | 8.49 | % |
E-28
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
C | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 67,045.684 | 5.43 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 85,634.897 | 6.93 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 209,634.550 | 16.69 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 78,986.576 | 6.39 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 66,836.398 | 5.41 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 73,899.075 | 5.98 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 1,285,969.431 | 10.78 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 8,292,409.353 | 69.50 | % | ||||||||
Y | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 71,175.264 | 15.39 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 101,240.427 | 21.89 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Securian Real Estate Securities | B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 4,266.691 | 5.98 | % | |||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 14,116.119 | 19.80 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 19,294.505 | 7.61 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 17,234.040 | 6.79 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 16,184.133 | 65.48 | % | ||||||||
Y | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 3,766,217.462 | 95.76 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Small Cap Core | A | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 526,796.855 | 5.02 | % | |||||||
B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 11,352.247 | 7.45 | % |
E-29
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
B | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 7,950.175 | 5.22 | % | ||||||||
B | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 15,812.479 | 10.37 | % | ||||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 36,435.489 | 23.91 | % | ||||||||
B | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 16,044.803 | 10.53 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 149,926.671 | 5.98 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 126,870.158 | 5.06 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 274,042.000 | 10.92 | % | ||||||||
C | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 306,064.825 | 12.20 | % | ||||||||
C | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 132,906.817 | 5.30 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 143,355.391 | 5.79 | % | ||||||||
C | UBS Financial Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ | 162,938.340 | 6.49 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 245,389.538 | 9.78 | % | ||||||||
E | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 11,792.845 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
I | American Enterprise Investment Services Minneapolis, MN | 2,371,939.529 | 11.19 | % | ||||||||
I | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 1,220,047.476 | 5.76 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 1,275,431.095 | 31.91 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 1,395,869.875 | 34.92 | % | ||||||||
N | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 242,573.207 | 6.07 | % |
E-30
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
T | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 13,912.076 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 194,309.082 | 20.41 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 124,547.576 | 13.08 | % | ||||||||
Y | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 211,616.582 | 22.23 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 66,757.398 | 7.01 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Small Cap Growth | B | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 58,813.144 | 8.58 | % | |||||||
B | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 36,055.300 | 5.26 | % | ||||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 97,939.522 | 14.30 | % | ||||||||
C | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 443,254.726 | 6.25 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 372,286.140 | 5.24 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 713,032.725 | 10.03 | % | ||||||||
C | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC Jersey City, NJ | 615,995.872 | 8.67 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 899,615.539 | 12.66 | % | ||||||||
I | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 5,210,856.128 | 12.09 | % | ||||||||
I | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 2,355,473.929 | 5.43 | % | ||||||||
N | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 502,222.158 | 7.51 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 565,705.859 | 8.46 | % | ||||||||
N | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 1,772,421.992 | 26.52 | % |
E-31
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
N | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 481,058.956 | 7.20 | % | ||||||||
T | Ivy Investment Management Company Shawnee Mission, KS | 13,728.720 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 849,596.215 | 12.80 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 344,869.230 | 5.20 | % | ||||||||
Y | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 541,267.623 | 8.15 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 516,416.110 | 7.78 | % | ||||||||
Ivy Value Fund | B | Edward Jones St. Louis, MO | 7,769.811 | 8.89 | % | |||||||
B | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 8,149.830 | 9.32 | % | ||||||||
B | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 4,678.950 | 5.35 | % | ||||||||
B | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 7,867.665 | 9.00 | % | ||||||||
C | LPL Financial San Diego, CA | 43,074.363 | 5.80 | % | ||||||||
C | First Clearing, LLC St. Louis, MO | 66,149.016 | 8.91 | % | ||||||||
C | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 58,276.042 | 7.85 | % | ||||||||
C | Raymond James & Associates St. Petersburg, FL | 212,396.690 | 28.60 | % | ||||||||
N | Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation Fund Shawnee Mission, KS | 4,617,923.319 | 73.76 | % | ||||||||
Y | National Financial Services Corporation Boston, MA | 1,659.123 | 8.83 | % | ||||||||
Y | Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Jacksonville, FL | 11,768.612 | 62.65 | % | ||||||||
Y | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. San Francisco, CA | 2,638.548 | 14.05 | % |
E-32
Fund Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Class | ||||||||
Ivy Wilshire Global Allocation | E | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 8,419.780 | 100.00 | % | |||||||
N | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 28,669.725 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
R | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 28,669.725 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Y | Waddell & Reed Shawnee Mission, KS | 28,669.725 | 100.00 | % |
InvestEd Portfolios
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
|
Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios
Portfolio Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Portfolio | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Asset Strategy | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 30,272,377.004 | 33.80 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 13,864,295.704 | 15.48 | % |
E-33
Portfolio Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Portfolio | ||||||||
II | Ohio National Life Insurance Co. Cincinnati, OH | 17,708,693.998 | 19.78 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Balanced | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 8,140,629.885 | 19.75 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 25,885,562.174 | 62.79 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Core Equity | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 6,555,509.013 | 11.27 | % | |||||||
II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 4,215,430.185 | 7.24 | % | ||||||||
II | United Investors Life Birmingham, AL | 6,348,003.151 | 10.91 | % | ||||||||
II | Bank of New York Mellon Mission, KS | 6,347,249.989 | 10.91 | % | ||||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 3,622,477.391 | 6.23 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Corporate Bond | II | Bank of New York-Mellon Mission, KS | 13,247,737.151 | 12.82 | % | |||||||
II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 7,047,452.618 | 6.82 | % | ||||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 23,955,469.639 | 23.18 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Energy | I | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 906,004.476 | 8.62 | % | |||||||
II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 1,346,098.552 | 12.81 | % | ||||||||
II | Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Fort Wayne, IN | 1,374,934.103 | 13.09 | % | ||||||||
II | Pacific Life Newport Beach, CA | 4,151,927.377 | 39.52 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Global Bond | II | Jefferson National Louisville, KY | 373,371.004 | 8.25 | % |
E-34
Portfolio Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Portfolio | ||||||||
II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 620,400.936 | 13.70 | % | ||||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 1,244,660.632 | 27.49 | % | ||||||||
II | Guardian Insurance & Annuity Co Inc Bethlehem, PA | 979,961.716 | 21.64 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP International Core Equity | II | Bank of New York-Mellon Mission, KS | 3,786,172.044 | 8.64 | % | |||||||
II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 2,269,457.127 | 5.18 | % | ||||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 20,057,537.959 | 45.79 | % | ||||||||
II | Waddell & Reed, Inc. Mission, KS | 13,603,675.670 | 15.53 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Limited-Term Bond | II | Bank of New York-Mellon Mission, KS | 16,562,120.192 | 18.70 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 8,860,579.366 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||
II | Waddell & Reed, Inc. Mission, KS | 51,651,887.916 | 19.44 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Micro Cap Growth | I | Ivy Investment Management Company Mission, KS | 11,867.792 | 71.31 | % | |||||||
I | Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. Ft. Wayne, IN | 4,773.735 | 28.69 | % | ||||||||
II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 545,838.986 | 17.71 | % | ||||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 2,161,524.515 | 70.14 | % | ||||||||
II | Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. Ft. Wayne, IN | 168,845.448 | 5.48 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Mid Cap Growth | I | Bank of New York-Mellon Mission, KS | 2,026,658.845 | 18.46 | % | |||||||
I | Waddell & Reed, Inc. Mission, KS | 7,593,465.197 | 23.05 | % |
E-35
Portfolio Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Portfolio | ||||||||
II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 11,614,878.863 | 23.51 | % | ||||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 5,757,412.985 | 11.65 | % | ||||||||
II | AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company Jersey City, NJ | 19,551,569.735 | 39.58 | % | ||||||||
II | Guardian Insurance & Annuity Bethlehem, PA | 9,995,361.788 | 20.23 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Natural Resources | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 4,199,451.232 | 15.31 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 9,286,656.767 | 33.85 | % | ||||||||
II | AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company Jersey City, NJ | 2,256,229.950 | 8.22 | % | ||||||||
II | Ohio National Life Insurance Co. Cincinnati, OH | 10,614,338.094 | 38.69 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Aggressive | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 9,227,220.073 | 66.27 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 4,412,298.157 | 31.69 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Conservative | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 14,785,642.525 | 72.03 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 5,677,607.566 | 27.66 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderate | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 117,141,186.991 | 75.38 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 37,493,432.404 | 24.13 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderate – Managed Volatility | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 34,171,944.791 | 32.75 | % |
E-36
Portfolio Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Portfolio | ||||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 70,125,025.411 | 67.21 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderately Aggressive | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 135,589,116.306 | 74.75 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 44,670,367.890 | 24.63 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderately Aggressive – Managed Volatility | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 2,577,689.795 | 15.95 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 13,540,130.451 | 83.79 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderately Conservative | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 33,127,181.452 | 72.80 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 12,291,603.789 | 27.01 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Pathfinder Moderately Conservative – Managed Volatility | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 6,994,536.718 | 52.92 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 6,223,473.493 | 47.08 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Science and Technology | I | Ivy Investment Management Company Mission, KS | 10,281.413 | 47.27 | % | |||||||
I | Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. Ft. Wayne, IN | 11,469.209 | 52.73 | % | ||||||||
II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 5,928,186.687 | 25.25 | % | ||||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 3,603,979.488 | 15.35 | % |
E-37
Portfolio Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Portfolio | ||||||||
II | AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company Jersey City, NJ | 4,568,791.756 | 19.46 | % | ||||||||
II | Ohio National Life Insurance Co. Cincinnati, OH | 4,194,048.617 | 17.86 | % | ||||||||
II | United Investors Life Birmingham, AL | 2,912,061.964 | 12.40 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Securian Real Estate Securities | II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 3,840,056.361 | 68.94 | % | |||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 1,446,472.301 | 25.97 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Small Cap Core | II | Bank of New York-Mellon Mission, KS | 1,288,701.389 | 7.65 | % | |||||||
II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 1,014,480.966 | 6.02 | % | ||||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 8,219,984.499 | 48.77 | % | ||||||||
II | Waddell & Reed, Inc. Mission, KS | 4,352,795.145 | 12.91 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Small Cap Growth | II | Bank of New York-Mellon Mission, KS | 2,028,311.821 | 6.40 | % | |||||||
II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 6,518,706.314 | 20.56 | % | ||||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 2,505,365.401 | 7.90 | % | ||||||||
II | AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company Jersey City, NJ | 5,774,687.321 | 18.21 | % | ||||||||
II | Waddell & Reed, Inc. Mission, KS | 6,859,694.568 | 10.82 | % | ||||||||
II | United Investors Life Birmingham, AL | 4,641,894.081 | 14.64 | % | ||||||||
Ivy VIP Value | II | Bank of New York-Mellon Mission, KS | 5,617,836.147 | 8.64 | % | |||||||
II | Nationwide Investment Services Corporation Columbus, OH | 9,850,111.192 | 15.15 | % |
E-38
Portfolio Name | Class | Shareholder Name, | Total Shares Owned | % of Portfolio | ||||||||
II | Minnesota Life Insurance Co. St. Paul, MN | 23,130,521.072 | 35.57 | % | ||||||||
II | Waddell & Reed, Inc. Mission, KS | 19,420,427.122 | 14.93 | % |
E-39
APPENDIX F
TRUSTEE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation, including deferred compensation amounts, paid to each Current Trustee by each Trust during its most recently completed fiscal year. No pension or retirement benefits have been accrued as a part of the Trust’s expenses. Mr. Herrmann, as an Interested Trustee, does not receive any compensation from any of the Trusts. The Trustee nominees did not serve as a Trustee of any Trust during the most recently completed fiscal year and therefore did not receive any compensation from the Trusts.
Aggregate Compensation for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018
Current Independent Trustees | Aggregate Compensation from the Ivy Funds | Total Compensation from the Fund Complex | ||||||
James M. Concannon | $ | 179,164 | $ | 335,250 | ||||
James D. Gressett | 167,433 | 313,000 | ||||||
Joseph Harroz, Jr. | 231,659 | 433,000 | ||||||
Glendon E. Johnson, Jr. | 171,812 | 321,750 | ||||||
Frank J. Ross, Jr. | 175,478 | 328,000 | ||||||
Michael G. Smith | 178,460 | 334,000 | ||||||
Edward M. Tighe | 175,479 | 328,000 |
Of the total compensation from the Fund Complex listed above, the following amounts have been deferred:
James M. Concannon | $ | 25,000 | ||
James D. Gressett | 50,000 | |||
Joseph Harroz, Jr. | 43,300 | |||
Glendon E. Johnson, Jr. | 0 | |||
Frank J. Ross, Jr. | 0 | |||
Michael G. Smith | 114,375 | |||
Edward M. Tighe | 131,200 |
F-1
Aggregate Compensation for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018
Current Independent Trustees | Aggregate Compensation from Ivy NextShares | Aggregate Compensation from Ivy Funds | Total Compensation from the Fund Complex | |||||||||
James M. Concannon | $ | 114 | $ | 207,518 | $ | 333,000 | ||||||
James D. Gressett | 105 | 184,745 | 300,000 | |||||||||
Joseph Harroz, Jr. | 149 | 269,620 | 433,000 | |||||||||
Glendon E. Johnson, Jr. | 109 | 198,147 | 318,000 | |||||||||
Frank J. Ross, Jr. | 112 | 202,436 | 325,000 | |||||||||
Michael G. Smith | 112 | 204,950 | 328,000 | |||||||||
Edward M. Tighe | 112 | 204,950 | 328,000 |
Of the total compensation from the Fund Complex listed above, the following amounts have been deferred:
James M. Concannon | $ | 50,000 | ||
James D. Gressett | 50,000 | |||
Joseph Harroz, Jr. | 42,500 | |||
Glendon E. Johnson, Jr. | 0 | |||
Frank J. Ross, Jr. | 0 | |||
Michael G. Smith | 128,750 | |||
Edward M. Tighe | 128,000 |
Aggregate Compensation for the Fiscal Year Ended September 31, 2018
Current Independent Trustees | Aggregate Compensation from the Ivy Funds | Total Compensation from the Fund Complex | ||||||
James M. Concannon | $ | 234,405 | $ | 331,750 | ||||
James D. Gressett | 211,036 | 300,000 | ||||||
Joseph Harroz, Jr. | 302,817 | 428,000 | ||||||
Glendon E. Johnson, Jr. | 219,989 | 309,250 | ||||||
Frank J. Ross, Jr. | 229,959 | 325,000 | ||||||
Michael G. Smith | 232,473 | 328,000 | ||||||
Edward M. Tighe | 232,473 | 328,000 |
Of the total compensation from the Fund Complex listed above, the following amounts have been deferred:
James M. Concannon | $ | 75,000 | ||
James D. Gressett | 50,000 | |||
Joseph Harroz, Jr. | 42,000 | |||
Glendon E. Johnson, Jr. | 0 | |||
Frank J. Ross, Jr. | 0 | |||
Michael G. Smith | 145,625 | |||
Edward M. Tighe | 128,000 |
F-2
Aggregate Compensation for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017
Current Independent Trustees | Aggregate Compensation from Ivy VIP | Aggregate Compensation from InvestEd | Total Compensation from the Fund Complex | |||||||||
James M. Concannon | $ | 51,627 | $ | 1,832 | $ | 316,000 | ||||||
James D. Gressett | 45,685 | 1,623 | 298,000 | |||||||||
Joseph Harroz, Jr. | 66,546 | 2,361 | 418,250 | |||||||||
Glendon E. Johnson, Jr. | 47,078 | 1,672 | 306,750 | |||||||||
Frank J. Ross, Jr. | 51,110 | 1,812 | 310,750 | |||||||||
Michael G. Smith | 48,434 | 1,720 | 315,250 | |||||||||
Edward M. Tighe | 48,103 | 1,708 | 309,250 |
Of the total compensation from the Fund Complex listed above, the following amounts have been deferred:
James M. Concannon | $ | 0 | ||
James D. Gressett | 50,000 | |||
Joseph Harroz, Jr. | 41,825 | |||
Glendon E. Johnson, Jr. | 0 | |||
Frank J. Ross, Jr. | 0 | |||
Michael G. Smith | 100,000 | |||
Edward M. Tighe | 123,700 |
F-3
FORM OF PROXY
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT NO MATTER HOW MANY SHARES YOU OWN. PLEASE CAST YOUR PROXY VOTETODAY!
PROXY CARD
|
|
| ||
Ivy Funds
Ivy NextShares
InvestEd Portfolios
Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios
JOINT SPECIAL MEETING OF THE SHAREHOLDERS ON APRIL 26, 2019
THIS PROXY IS BEING SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EACH TRUST
The undersigned, having received Notice of the April 26, 2019 Joint Special Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) of Ivy Funds, Ivy NextShares, InvestEd Portfolios and Ivy Variable Insurance Portfolios (the “Trusts”), on behalf of each of their series (each, a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”) and the related Proxy Statement, hereby appointsJennifer K. Dulski and Scott J. Schneider as proxies, each with full power of substitution and revocation, to represent the undersigned and to vote all shares of the Fund(s) that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Meeting of the Trusts to be held at 6300 Lamar Avenue, Overland Park, Kansas on April 26, 2019 at 2:00 p.m., Central Time, and any adjournments or postponements thereof. The undersigned hereby revokes any and all proxies with respect to such shares previously given. This instruction may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise at the Meeting by execution of a subsequent proxy card, by written notice to the Secretary of the Trusts or by voting in person at the Meeting.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT NO MATTER HOW MANY SHARES YOU OWN. IF YOU ARE NOT VOTING BY PHONE OR INTERNET, PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY CARD ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for this Joint Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 26, 2019. The proxy statement for this meeting is available at:www.proxypush.com/ivy.
| ||||
| ||||
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH PROPOSAL.
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees of each Trust. It will be voted as specified. If no specification is made, this proxy shall be voted IN FAVOR of each proposal. If any other matters properly come before the Meeting to be voted on, the proxy holders will vote, act and consent on those matters in accordance with the views of management.
TO VOTE, MARK CIRCLE(S) BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS. Example:🌑
1. To elect eleven (11) trustees to the Board of Trustees of each Trust:
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s) mark the “For All Except” and write the nominee number(s) on the line provided.
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| ||||||
|
PLEASE BE SURE TO SIGN AND DATE THIS CARD ON THE REVERSE SIDE